The SerpentsteemCreated with Sketch.

in politics •  5 years ago 

"When we call to the attention of the minarchist that his setup places a venomous serpent atop society, he is apt to reply that eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. But please note, dear minarchist, that if you did not put the snake in place to begin with you would have much less, if any, need for such onerous vigilance, a task that we know many will fail to carry out." - Robert Higgs

king-cobra-405623_1280.jpg
Image credit

A minarchist is a believer in the need for a minimal night watchman state for the security of society. I don't recall the source off-hand, but it has been said that a minarchist believes too much government is a bad thing, so therefore government should only have a total monopoly in a handful of the most important things in society. This clearly demonstrates the fundamental flaw in such a position.

I once adhered to this belief myself, but have since learned the nature of centralized political authority, the perverse incentives economic and psychological that assail those who gain such power even if their intent is virtuous, and how rarely the virtuous seek such power. I can no longer support this belief. Politics is not the means whereby wise men rein in the excesses of society bent on self-destruction, but rather whereby base men seek gain at the expense of others.

Yes, there are real problems which governments claim to address, but these claims ring hollow under serious examination. We need decentralized solutions and voluntary choice, not dictates and coercion. Until that is realized, there will be no real solution to poverty, health care, education, crime, or any of the other matters used to gin up support for the political class and their usurpations.

The mistakes or malice of people in power can only bring harm to all under their power. Since people in power will always suffer from the lack of actionable information and their own biases, the only result can be chaos even if they are people of magical virtue, and such do not tend to win in the game of politics anyway.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Curious if there has ever been a society where no one was in power. It seems human nature dictates there will always be those who would enlist others to create a base of power. This would be furthered by the fact we are not equal in ability nor intentions, and those who excel at certain ways would by the authority of their expertise become the power of those structures.

A lot of anarchists say all hierarchy is bad by default. I would instead suggest that the key point is consent versus coercion. People have different skills, time preferences, value scales, etc. and find ways to organize and cooperate. Politics is not a manifestation of this process, though.

"Authority" is one word used for two disparate concepts: expertise and bullying. That causes a lot of confusion (probably, intentionally). I will listen to experts, and they won't try to force me to follow them. But political "authority" is The Most Dangerous Superstition and it can... Bite My Shiny Metal.JPG

And, here are my thoughts on hierarchy: Hierarchy

Word

Posted using Partiko Android