What happened to the fear of communism (red scare)?

in politics •  7 years ago 

Here is an article that I wrote just recently, this is an exclusive for my fellow esteemers, as I have not even posted this on my own blog as of right now. An exclusive straight from my analytical mind to yours.
Enjoy!!!

Ayn Rand once said, "There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the same ultimate end: Communism proposes to enslave men by force, Socialism - by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide".

Young people are being brainwashed, and they are being fed misinformation that will prove detrimental to America’s future.  Our Universities are teaching collectivism, central planning, and communism to our impressionable youth, and it is going to sink us as a country if we do not get a handle on it.  What is contributing to this communist push in our educational institutions?  We executed Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for passing information related to the atomic bomb to the Russians.  This happened at the height of Soviet/communist paranoia in America with figures like J Edgar Hoover seeking to eradicate communism from America and showing no mercy in doing so.  Where did the shift occur? We can probably start with academia, and the leftist revolutionary mindset that has consumed our academic institutions.   University professors are generally left wing extremists that bring a hatred for America into the classroom and this ideology is adapted by many students that don’t already have an ideological foundation.  If this were not bad enough, you also have students and faculty that are harassed, ridiculed, and sometimes even attacked for sporting an ideology that is contrary to the official academia narrative.  Capitalism is mischaracterized and demonized, and communism is mischaracterized and glorified.  They teach that socialism and communism are two different things, when in reality both strive to achieve the same goal, they just represent different stages of the process.

so·cial·ism/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/ a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the com

com·mu·nism /ˈkämyəˌnizəm/ a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs of the community as a whole.

    Socialism acts as a mode of transition that takes place as a country pulls away from free markets and capitalist principles, and starts moving toward communism.  Socialism is communism economic model, but as one proceeds to communism a political model is introduced in addition to the economic model.  Ayn rand once stated, “There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism -- by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide”.  Communism was responsible for the deaths of 100 million people in the 20th century, and the term socialism is used as a strawman in order to direct attention away from communism murderous past.  In some cases, communism is pushed straight up, and many students when asked about the practicality of capitalism as opposed to communism advocate for communism because it appears “fair” and capitalism will be viewed as the bad guy because the perception of some that sees only greed and oppression.

    Communism fails to achieve the end that it apparently advocates for, that being the elimination of social classes.  This failure is evidenced by the fact that this ideology creates an oligarchy, or an elite government class that rules over the common people or peasants.  This absolute power given to the elite class does not have the best interests of the people in mind, and the iron fist that rules becomes greater as the stealing, murdering, and oppression snowballs.  When the people stand up against the tyranny via revolutionary tactics, and refuse to fall in line, mass genocide is the result.  Socialism/Communism has never resulted in prosperity for average citizens and it always ends in a bloodbath.  Capitalism has made the American economy what it is today, and is only economic model that has the potential to create true individual wealth, and increase significantly one’s standard of living through incentive, and competition, not greed.
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Communism and Capitalism are two heads of the same coin. Capitalist (((bankers))) financed the Bolshevik Revolution, and continue to subvert Western Civilization by flooding White Nations with non Whites in an obvious act of war against my people. Capitalism has done more harm to Western Civilization than communism. Capitalism has turned our nations into shopping malls. Look at how comfortable America is with our relationship with China. China is a communist nation with capitalistic tendencies. Again, Capitalism and Communism are NOT mutually exclusive. they are one in the same. We are and should be better than that.

you cant be communist with capitalist tenancies lmao. Delusional

Communism is communal control of the means of production where capitalism is private control, they are mutually exclusive

Capitalism was an economic model that allowed people to have and acquire wealth without conquest, raping, and pillaging. Capitalism is only detrimental to those that seek a handout. Communism is the opposite, as it offers free everything to everybody. But it is not free because liberty is lost in the process. Yes, china has adopted capitalism as an economic model, but only in the business sense. Politically China is as communist as they come. The difference in China is that they seek a profit through use of capitalist ideology, but the profit is for the communist government, not for the individual. The fact that China recognizes the advantages of capitalism, only proves the effectiveness of capitalism. Capitalism has been responsible for the highest standard of living ever known to man. Communism kills, see the 20th century and close to 100 million murdered. Capitalism allows for personal growth through incentive and competition, as this is how innovation prospers.

Well said. Keep in mind it seems you both are on the same side, more or less.

The fact that capitalism works in communist China proves that they are two faces of the same coin, and the way that "Capitalist Corporations" make profit off of the slave labor in China proves that point even further. It proves that in order for the type of capitalism you espouse to properly function, an entire segment of humanity must suffer as slave labor. The capitalists who are exploiting Chinese slave labor would do the same to you in a heart beat if they could.

So if you are not a communist or a capitalist, which ideology or economic model are you in favor of? I'm very curious by your comments!

I think of myself as a constitutionalist in an original interpretation of the document. America wasn't always a, "muh free market principles at any and all costs". That came after central banksters stole this nation from it's people turning America into what it amounts to basically, a Wallmart where everything is for sale, and any third worlder can become a citizen. The founders made it clear who they intended this nation to be for, and it wasn't who will quickly become the majority. In fact we gave Mexico back after taking Mexico City because we didn't want their population to be a part of this nation.

Interesting perspective! Are you as extreme as an ethno-statist then?

Of course. America's founders set this nation up as an explicitly White nation.

I guess I must've missed that part of the original founders document. This ethno-state stuff is kinda hard for me to swallow but I see many more coming forward in support of this idea (which will never happen IMO). Anywhere specifically that you interpret an "all white nation" in the constitution?

Every single White nation on this planet is facing genetic annihilation. When White people become completely disenfranchised, it won't matter what nation it is happens in either, white genocide is happening. It is real. When finalized, nations victimized by these rats will be doomed to utter destruction.

There is a reason why Sub Saharan Africans never invented the wheel. The end of the White Race will be the end of humanity. Maybe, the Rapture is a real thing?

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

The Naturalization Act of 1790 made it clear that only, "White persons of good character" could become citizens of the US. I don't really see how you didn't know that, but it doesn't really surprise me. The same people who drafted the Constitution passed legislation which only permitted Whites to become US citizens, and that law was signed into law by George Washington.

If the founders saw what has happened to the nation they created, they would take up arms again in the 2nd revolutionary war.

It is clear as day who the founders intended this nation to be for, and prior to Hart - Cellar in 1965, the US was 80%, or more White. The people who passed that travesty promised Americans at the time that the demographics in the US would not change. Well, here we are.

Believe me when I say that as whites become a minority, White Identity Politics will become a very powerful political force. We are already about 10% of the population, and my generation is shaping up to be the most right leaning in a hundred years.

I have noticed a lot of kids (12-18), that are my nephews age, do seem to reject the leftist nanny state. Glad to see that, but not much in the way of an ethno-state. A lot of his friends are non-whites, as you so pointed out, given our now representative demographics. Just don't know if there that far on the right is all.
I did wiki the Naturalization Act of 1790, and sure as shit it does say exactly what you stated. Just don't see that being a point of emphasis for some sort of revolution politically w/all the hysterical "everyone is a racist," culture nowadays. Perhaps in the future. But no where in the near.

Wow, you are about as ignorant as they come. You don't understand how markets function, you are a typical commie, bleeding heart liberal that acts solely on emotion with little or no recognition of reality, or facts. Go home snowflake! You give academia a bad name, but it is not all your fault because you have been brainwashed. Go find yourself a safe space, a curl up into a fetal position, I'm sure that your enablers will cuddle you and tell you it is ok. The real world doesn't work that way, deal with it. Suck it up buttercup, if you our capitalist system here, go to a legit communist country and then come back and tell me that communism and capitalism are the same.

Wow, you are about as ignorant as they come. You don't understand how markets function, you are a typical commie, bleeding heart liberal that acts solely on emotion with little or no recognition of reality, or facts. Go home snowflake! You give academia a bad name, but it is not all your fault because you have been brainwashed. Go find yourself a safe space, a curl up into a fetal position, I'm sure that your enablers will cuddle you and tell you it is ok. The real world doesn't work that way, deal with it. Suck it up buttercup, if you our capitalist system here, go to a legit communist country and then come back and tell me that communism and capitalism are the same.

What a precious little snowflake you are. You are the one who is so triggered. that you even posted your copy and paste dribble twice. Everything I stated is factual, and you have no argument to refute it, so you have to try and insult. That is what LOLbertardians do when they get called out as the intellectual midgets they are. I hate communist much more than you BTW. I just have a broader worldview, and don't see everything as cookie cutter shapes. that is what literal retards do.

A broader world view? Given your arguments, that expanded world view probably includes killing babies in the name of women's rights, and believing that a dude can lop off his unit and call himself a girl. A broader world view that recognizes fantasyland as the world we live in, is not a good thing. Your opinions are not facts, and when you grow up and join the rest of us here in reality, you will learn that this is true. Projection is a cool trick, but you libs aren't very good at it. You just responded by calling me out for the same things I referenced in my analysis of your own behavior. That university education hasn't sharpened that "broad" worldview that you tout. Acting on 100% emotion will get you in trouble, if you don't run it through your brain first. Compassion is fine, but it must not be blind compassion void of common sense. I am done with you now so go and read some Karl Marx errrr or maybe some Dr. Seuss. Go and ask your babysitter for some hot chocolate and maybe they will give you a cute puppy to hold to calm your nerves. I am not triggered I respond with rationale thought, you respond with your so called "compassion". Go home rookie!

You assume a lot. Probably, way more than is healthy. You must be a boomer because no one other than one could be this clownish. Again, you cannot refute the facts so you go on about nonsense. The simple fact of the matter is that the Capitalist system we have right now is completely corrupted, and as I’ve stated, previously, Communism and Capitalism are two hands washing eachother. I’m not a fan of either, but I am a strong proponent of euntrepeniership. Not huge companies running over my people to turn a profit. You however want to go on about faggotry, and trannies? Who is the one projecting here, guy? LMFAO. You should, probably, keep that gutter mentality to yourself. It makes you come off as an Ass Clown.

I'm not a boomer, so maybe you assume too much. I'm going to quote Ronal Reagan,

"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so."

A Time for Choosing, Address on behalf of Senator Barry Goldwater,
Rendezvous with Destiny, October 27, 1964

I'm sure you can see the relevance here to your assumption that everything you say is fact.

Also I will not refute your opinions, because they are your views, wrong but they are yours. Also I am not going to try my and refute your statements because I'm not changing your mind, and you are not changing mine. I explained in my first few posts here why your views were wrong but because you won't recognize my response, you say that there was no refuting. Go off and play now.

The fact that capitalism works in communist China proves that they are two faces of the same coin

Just for the record. This does not prove that.

That is simply one possibility.

It could also be that China is only Communist in some points but they have several large city states where they essentially allow free market capitalism to reign supreme and they are not communist at all in those locations. This is what my findings have been.

So it is more like a Communist nation propping up Communism by funding it from several city states that do not practice Communism at all.

These are typically Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Singapore.

It is easy to say something proves something else, but often there are more possibilities than we see and simply picking the one that we currently believe as the truth is not always the best course.

In studying Hong Kong and the other city states I do not really see much in the way of Communism there. People very much do own private property in those locations. They also own the means to production. It is not public, therefore it is not Communism.

Yet that wealth funnels into the bulk of China where Communism is dominant and it seems to suck off of that labor force much like a tick, or mosquito.

Communism and socialism end up being government sanctioned monopolies from what I can see. This is why the RICHEST capitalists in the U.S. like Jeff Bezos (richest man in the world currently) advocate socialism, and marxism. All it will do is give them more government sanctioned power. It makes the process for the worst offenders of what Pro-Marxists are deluded about have the easiest and most total control possible.

They like to talk about monopolies and slave labor, etc. Yet their process simple puts in a government sanctioned monopoly and country wide slave labor.

Easy to do when you remove the possibility of competition.

The other thing that fuels it all is Envy. "Why does that person have X and I don't? That's not fair." Though it'll often be hidden in virtue signalling where they will change it to "Why do some people have X, and other people in our society don't?"

Answer: Reality works that way. There is no artificial bubble of everything being equal. You being one inch to the left of me has the vast potential of changing what happens. What if a bullet goes one inch to the left of me? You are wounded or killed and I am not. What happens if that bullet goes one to the right of you? I am wounded or killed.

It's called reality.

Expecting hand outs is not. Some people are going to get lucky. Other people are just going to work harder. Other people will be lazy. Other people will be unlucky.

The Marxist ideology is foolish. I actually look like Karl Marx a bit right now... so if I take a black and white photo will that make me suddenly have authority?

Jeff Bezos owns about 100 billion. Jacob Rotchild owns well over 500 trillion (including all the media that keeps saying that is not true)

So Jeff Bezos is not the richest man in the world, he is just pocket change!

And yes I'm starting to wonder if you are Karl Marx...

Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild family had a red six pointed star that hung in front of his office. No where in the bible is the the so called Star of David mentioned. There is however the star of Moloch, which is what the Israeli Flag has on it. The Jewish world banks have funded both sides of almost every conflict since the Rothschilds came to power, and both WWI and WWII where both a direct result of the Rothschilds determination to create a Jewish Ethnostate in Israel. Just take a look at the Balfour Declaration written in part by Walter Rothschild if you don't believe me.

Don't worry I fully believe you!

You are right. Bezos is just the wealthiest that we have the actual numbers for. The Rothschilds and some other families dwarf him if everything is known.

My beard isn't that out of hand yet. I may have to do something so I can make a photo like that of myself before I shave next time.

The pro-Marxist, Communist people seem to see such images as some kind of sign of authority. :)

They like to show off this guy too...

Peter Kropotkin

There are some more modern ones that I've seen similar images of.

:)

Pinko beardie commies...

Blood and Soil is the way forward. Doing what is best for the people of a nation is the only thing a government should be focused on. Capitalism has done nothing except to create an immoral deracinated consumerist society that is one step away from permenant slavery. You are completely correct in your assertion that communism, and capitalism are truly compatible.

One hundred million people dead. You call that less harmful?

I'm not certain what your comment is supposed to mean. It seems like it is out of context, or spam. Did you even read the statement you replied to because I never used the words, "less harmful", or referred to muh 100,000,000.

What, are you using two accounts or something? I replied to the OP, not you.

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Relevance:Words Of Wisdom

Socialism and communism are terrifying political systems for a population, it is a corrupt system, failure that the only thing it does is bring poverty to society and riches to those who hold the power of the country. I am from Venezuela, where a socialist government has taken a rich country to the point where its people have to eat of the trash.

communism is worker control of the means of production, and many anarchist forms exist.

the ussr was more democratic than the united states

and capitalism is the most destructive system in history

also Venezuela is capitalist lmao, they have more private industry than most countries in europe

Yeah, Venezuela went more the socialist route... Though China is also allegedly communist, but they've propped that up for years with several capitalist city states such as Hong Pong, Singapore, and Shanghai.

Not surprising... communism without currency, capitalism, etc though it technically is not communism ONLY works on very small scales such as hippy communes. Too many variables for the arrogant power mad central planners to accurately track.

They become the worst aspects of what they like to decry about capitalism. They essentially become large government mandated monopolists plantations. Viva Slavery!

social democracy is not socialism lmao, its capitalism with a happy face drawn on it

"Not surprising... communism without currency, capitalism, etc though it technically is not communism ONLY works on very small scales such as hippy communes. Too many variables for the arrogant power mad central planners to accurately track."
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-anarchy-works

social democracy is not socialism lmao, its capitalism with a happy face drawn on it

Yeah... yeah nothing is ever socialism or communism with guys like you EXCEPT when it works briefly before it implodes.

Venezuela was the poster child of success for Socialism for a couple of years from people of your ilk until it imploded as they always do.

Good ideas don't require force.

Force = Slavery.

Communists and Socialists can take their ideology and shove it where the sun doesn't shine as far as I'm concerned. I'll continue to feel that way until they can come up with a REAL/FACTUAL way it can be done without force and 100% voluntarily.

I am from Venezuela, where a socialist government has taken a rich country to the point where its people have to eat of the trash.

You have my sympathy and support. I know quite a few people from Venezuela here on Steemit and this is a common thing I hear from them.

It is also sad that the only countries in the EU that are resisting a lot of the EU trends are those that were part of the communist block to during the time of the U.S.S.R. People who have been there, and done that, and don't want to do it again.

It is only a bunch of fools that can't learn from history, and truly think things through that are repeating the same paths, and same arguments that have already been walked.

Thank you very much for your solidarity, really feeling the empathy of other nationals is a great help, does not make us feel alienated or rejected by the rest of the world.

It is a pity that we as humans do not learn from our past mistakes, we suffer from lack of memory, which leads us to make the same mistakes without even realizing it. It seems that it is a mistake of all humans in the world, we must move forward and take into account our past to make a better future. Thanks friend, I'm following you to see you more often by Steemit

what happened?
FUDCurrs happened.
and
Socialists in the Public Schools

FUDCurrs... I like it.

Ding ding ding we have a winner! I agree 100%

I live communism in my own flesh (I live in Venezuela) and I can say that the one good communism is the one that is dead.

Venezuela has more private property than the united states lmao

Thank you for taking the time to comment on the true nature and ultimate goal of communism. I can't imagine the hell you are living in right now. God bless you and your fellow countrymen, don't give up!

the ultimate goal of communism is freedom of the workers and Venezuela is capitalist lmao

Currently, we not only suffer an economic crisis thanks to communism but also to a social crisis. The anarchy that exists and the social decomposition is very large. There is no rule of law.

yeah I heard the anarchists are getting stronger there, like revolutionary spain. Anarchists rising tends to help the people in every way.

Also can you even define communism?

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

ironic

You know very little, I've studied the constitutions and read accounts of soviet union. You practically missed the bullseye, under Stalin's regime worker rights have improved dramatically so much that they had more power then their supervisor etc. The idea of communism not only has empowered the state but the people also, there is a term we put on this called the dictatorship of the proleteriat. So how about you pick up some historical documents rather then books that have a bias view on them ;)

Why don't you tell the 100 million people that were murdered at the hands of communist leaders, about bias! You are speaking favorably about Joseph Stalin and in the one that needs educating?? You are demented. I suppose you love Mao, Pol Pot, Che, and all of the other murderers that were good for "workers" according to your twisted version of history?

You are demented by believing in a system that has killed way more than our has in 5 years.

Wow, a YouTube video, because there is no propaganda or falsehoods on YouTube. I could post a YouTube video saying that a space alien gave birth to Elvis's love child. Would you take that to the bank? But that is neither here nor there, bottom line here is you are praising murderous regimes and making generalizations and assumptions about things that you are unfamiliar with. Vladimir Lenin referred to your kind as "useful idiot".

very good bro...

For quotes instead of using the box that we then have to scroll to read try starting a line with > which is the markdown for quote.

it will look like this.

It makes it easier to read. Other than that great work, up voted, and resteemed.

If you can edit your post and change those and it'll make it easier to read without having to scroll to read those.

the formatting makes this hard to read