In the last week, the Australian government announced that a US$96 million optional non-binding postal vote would be held to gather the opinion of Australians as to whether same sex marriage should be legalized.
This arose after the Australian senate blocked attempts by the Australian government to have a compulsory referendum election on the issue. Whilst many prefer a parliamentary vote (where law makers would directly decide whether or not to legalize same sex marriage), such attempts have also not prevailed.
Is such a non-binding postal vote a good reflection of one person, one vote democracy, or a waste of money given its non-binding nature?
Here in Amsterdam we just had the parade.
https://steemit.com/travel/@heyitshaas/100k-people-at-the-gay-parade-one-big-celebration-of-equality-in-amsterdam-pictures
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Such a contrast of worlds
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If the majority of young people enrol and yes wins and the goverment ignore it then the newly enrolled can vote in a goverment that says yes. You can only delay progress.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit