RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%

in politics •  7 years ago 

For a long time now capitalistic systems have worked well for progress and creating wealth but not spreading it around. For that we relied on government. However governments tend to be bureaucratic, inefficient and even corrupt especially when they are really controlled by corporations not people. What we have now is this illusion that capitalism is a panacea. It will solve all our problems when everyone becomes an independent business owner.

Here in the U.S. the push for everyone to have their own 401k retirement plans and medical insurance has been a big part of the problem in my view. The company you worked for used to take care of that so you could work with some peace of mind. The burden of all that has been shifted to the individual who usually has no time or expertise to navigate all the complexities of investing and insurance all the while benefiting corporations.

What we really have is a system that pools money at the top and it is expected to “trickle-down” wealth to everyone else through the magic of benevolence and job creation. Unchecked capitalism can be as bad as any other tyranny if its only purpose is to create wealth. There needs to be some mechanism to redistribute wealth fairly and equitability and UBI may be the answer.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I am Australian but live in Finland and both countries are essentially well ahead of the American social systems (from my understanding). Finland is likely well ahead in many ways considering largely free healthcare, education systems and social support systems. Every place has their problems though.

Capitalism eventually consumes itself and has to be reset. In the past, the resets have been catastrophic losses of human life through war and the like. You'd think that we could do better with all of the technology and knowledge we have yet, observation of behavior tells different.