Well, it depends. With drugs, which kinda started the conversation, that would be coaxing kids to buy stuff, forcing drugs to some people (eg: in drinks and shit), cartel wars ... that kind of thing. Regarding borders, here in eastern Europe, we have it pretty well, shout warnings, shoot in the air, then shoot at target. That seems about right to me. Initiating violence upon the peaceful is not ok, but there will be people who do it, hence we have police to initiate violence upon them.
RE: Classical Liberalism 101: Is Prohibition a Benefit or a Bane to Society?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Classical Liberalism 101: Is Prohibition a Benefit or a Bane to Society?
That's the irony right there: There will be those who initiate violence upon the peaceful, so we have the police force to do it to them first???
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No, we have armed police to attempt to deescalate the conflict, then respond with violence if necessary. Sure, I can agree it doesn't always work out perfectly, but better than no police, wouldn't you say?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I say private security guards would do the job better, and are.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No, because every private entity will dole it out differently, that wouldn't be rule of law, but de facto feudalism.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ok, I've just about reached the point of agreeing to disagree. You? :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I guess...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Keep learning: that's the only lesson here!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit