Exclusive article from me at Before Its News. I typed up this article for this news website. Thank You Before Its News.
I have seen a new case before the United States Supreme Court pending
right now for a Conference proceeding. A case where it brings up what
many have suspected for a very long time. Blogs have covered last decade about how John Roberts the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the U.S.) was blackmailed into supporting Obamacare.
A new case before the U.S. Supreme Court
has directly brought allegations to Chief Justice John Roberts for him
to review last month. He or his law clerk did review them as a matter of
law since they were distributed to the chambers,
but Roberts did not recuse himself from the case on record despite the
credible allegations against him. The blackmail allegations is a scheme
involving a very heinous crime of child murder and raping of a child on videotape,
and being ordered to such a horrible thing at gunpoint by whoever was
told to blackmail that particular target. These allegations have came
from a licensed attorney (proved in exhibits asking the judge to reconsider order refusing a special master to review over the alleged blackmail tapes) who is obligated under the professional rules of conduct to tell the truth on the internet. This attorney also interviewed a witness who also said statements about John Roberts. Then there are the federal court filed flight logs
for Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express airplane which had John Roberts
named two times in the flight logs. This attorney may have enough
evidence that Chief Justice Roberts may have allegedly raped and murdered an underaged person. He also said he would not make these allegations without having a reliable source for it. Not my allegations, but the allegations are referenced in the Supreme Court case and on Wayback Machine archived tweets of this attorney, and the evidence of things against John Roberts are filed in the Supreme Court case in the supplement to request for recusel. See “Supplement to recusal filed.” and at the “Other” filed pleadoing.
See Supreme Court CASE no. 22-6123. No this is not the Raland Brunson case but that case and the blackmail scheme case will both be heard at the CONFERENCE on January 6, 2023, less than two weeks aaway.
The petitioner who had filed such a case, had filed emergency motions asking for the chief justice to recuse himself for the allegations of being blackmailed. The other emergency motion was asking for a response from the U.S. Government about their role in blackmailing federal judges with sex tapes to secure a criminal conviction of an innocent journalist blogger
person using a “rigged judicial process” by usage of blackmail to rig
the entire case. If they did use blackmailed judges to win in federal
court, they may be doing this with who knows how many federal judges.
This must be investigated by the brave courageous people in law
enforcement if we want to see confidence in the U.S. courts again.