Lol, don't you know Stinc, et al, is steem royalty?
They decree how things are , and we like it.
Well, the morons that don't know better might like it, and maybe the cucks.
I don't like it, at all.
RE: Poll: Enhancing the "Mute" Feature
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Poll: Enhancing the "Mute" Feature
Not true, the EIP isn't their decree, nor was linear their decree, and if they really think they are royalty they need a lesson in history as a lot of dethroned kings and queens caution against abusing their position, along with many more exiled or executed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It was announced and then witnesses were asked to support it.
We know the witnesses positions are contingent on keeping some of the et al happy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You're conveniently leaving out the precursor to the announcement, which was by and large the numerous stakeholders diligently addressing the issue of bidbots/content indifferent voting and putting forth the idea by debate and discussion alike in other people's minds so that it finally couldn't be ignored or dismissed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes.
It wasn't this one so much as it was the last one.
The thirty some months it took to give in to what had been on the table all along is what upsets me.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit