"The scientist who invented the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test kit was Kary B. Mullis."
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=30880
"The late Dr Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR “test,” has been blowing the whistle on Fauci and Big Pharma for 30 years."
https://lightonlight.education/the-mysterious-death-of-dr-faucis-most-notable-critic-just-before-covid-19-dr-kary-mullis-the-inventor-of-the-pcr-technique/
"Kary received a Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1993, for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The process, which Kary Mullis conceptualized in 1983, is hailed as one of the monumental scientific techniques of the twentieth century."
https://www.karymullis.com/
"a promising young scientist named Kary Mullis, had dreamed up a technique to exponentially replicate tiny scraps of DNA. He called it polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and if it worked it would change the world and likely earn Cetus a mountain of money."
https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/winter-2019/intolerable-genius-berkeleys-most-controversial-nobel-laureate
Kary Mullis explains why his PCR test is not a diagnostic test
"Dr. Kary Mullis, who discovered the PCR assay, stated it “lets you pick the piece of DNA you’re interested in and have as much of it as you want” (Mullis, 1990)."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102308/
"The FDA’s second, more telling recall, highlights what the PCR’s creator, Nobel Prize winner Dr. Kary Mullis, warned us about. He stated the PCR test was meant to be used for analysis, not a diagnosis, and that it could be abused by using it for diagnosis to inflate numbers in a pandemic situation for political gain."
https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2021/07/fda-admits-pcr-test-inflated-numbers-vindicates-dr-mullis/
"Kary Mullis - who was awarded a Nobel Chemistry Prize - has always stated that the RT/PCR test being used worldwide by the WHO and government health agencies to test for COVID 19 was never to be used for infectious diseases. In this short video he explains why and says that - using certain protocols or "tweaking" the RNA sequences - they can come up with any result they want."
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wOSeTz57xrCF/
"July 16, 2020, podcast, “This week in virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed."
"“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.
Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.
That’s called a false positive.
What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35."
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/27/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-pcr-test-has-fatal-flaw/
"Mullis’ comments are unsurprising for anyone who has been paying attention to the behaviour of the authorities during the COVID-19 catastrophe. The technology relies on amplifying results many times over. If they are amplified less than about 35 times, no-one will test positive. If they are amplified 60 times, everyone will test positive."
https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/05/pcr-inventor-it-doesnt-tell-you-that-you-are-sick/
"In the early 1990’s, PCR, (Polymerase Chain Reaction) came into popular use, and Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize for it in 1993. PCR, simply put, is a thermal cycling method used to make up to billions of copies of a specific DNA sample, making it large enough to study."
https://principia-scientific.com/the-covid-19-pcr-test-is-key-to-the-pandemic-fraud/
"According to the FDA, that comparative CT is too low, and will produce too many false negatives. This, despite the scientific consensus, which states anything over 35 CTs is scientifically unjustifiable as it produces enormous amounts of false positives.
According to an April 2020 study, a CT of 17 must be used to obtain 100% confirmed real positives. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. At 33 cycles, the false positive rate is 80%. Beyond 34 cycles, the false positive rate reaches 100%.
Because the PCR test cannot discern between live virus and dead, noninfectious viral debris"
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pcr-testing-incorrect-use/
"The main test used to diagnose coronavirus is so sensitive it could be picking up fragments of dead virus from old infections, scientists say."
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54000629
"In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless."
https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/12/08/new-peer-review-report-finds-pcr-test-useless-further-debunking-asymptomatic-superspreader-theory/
Dead virus fragments are causing COVID-19 reinfection false positives
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200504/Dead-virus-fragments-are-causing-COVID-19-reinfection-false-positives.aspx
The inventor of PCR never said it wasn’t designed to detect infectious diseases
https://fullfact.org/online/pcr-test-mullis/