According to Karen Hudes, Trump is now bankrupt

Karen Hudes
@KarenHudes

12:00 AM · Oct 26, 2017

"All Trump had to do to keep from defaulting on the commercial lien that I placed on all his assets was to tell the truth about whether or not the Constitution of 1789 was in force and effect. My last comment was erased and I have a screenshot of this one."
https://twitter.com/karenhudes/status/923398927956705280?lang=en

Karen Hudes Whistleblower: Both Gen. Dunford and Trump are bankrupt traitors. N. Korea not descending in WWIII. Bankers exposed.

KAREN HUDES©
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD),
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Joint Ministerial Committee of the Boards of Governors of the Bank and the Fund on the Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries (DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE)
Global Debt Facility (TVM-LSM-666)
By: Karen-A.: Hudes©,
C/o 5203 Falmouth Road
Bethesda, Maryland
near [20816] Non-domestic
Líen Claimants

RENWICK L. PAYNE
PETER NEWSHAM
JOSEPH F. DUNFORD, JR.
MURIEL BOWSER
DONALD J. TRUMP,
ALL KNOWN INSURERS,
ALL UNKNOWN INSURERS,
ALL UNKNOWN ENTITIES,
All Agents & Principals,
Both PUBLIC & Private,
JOHN & JANE DOES 1-100, et al.,
Jointly & Severally,
All Property(s) at:
ALL KNOWN INSURERS,.
ALL UNKNOWN INSURERS,
ALL UNKNOWN ENTITIES,
All Agents & Principals,
Both PUBLIC & Private,
JOHN & JANE DOES 1-100, et al.,
Jointly & Severally,
All Property(s) at:
C/o 1818 H Street, N.W.
700-19th Street, N.W.
1900 Pennsylvania Ave NW,
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Lien Debtors,

                     (Above space is for Public recording in UCC)

PLAIN FACTS IN COMMERCE

Re: Your account payable owed one million eight hundred thousand metric tonnes of gold, plus other assets in TVM-LSM-666 to Lien Claimants, for lawbreaking /unlawful damaging acts committed against the Secured Parties by you, under the color of the Articles of Agreement of the IBRD and IMF, state and federal laws, codes, rules, regulations, statutes, actual & Common Law, all while “acting in concert”.

Dear Agent(s), Principal(s), Unknown Entity(s), and Insurer(s):

Whereas the unchanging principles of commerce are applied herein to this instrument:

I, Karen-A.: Hudes, whom you have wronged, declare, under penalty of perjury, the Articles of Agreement of the IBRD and IMF, Constitutions, and Laws, that the following is true, correct and not misleading:

1. A matter must be expressed to be resolved.

2. The eternal, unchanged principles of Commercial Law are:

a) A workman is worthy of his hire. (Thou shalt not steal.)
b) All are equal under the law. (No one is above the law.)
c) In Commerce, truth is sovereign. (Thou shalt not bear false witness.)
d) Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.
e) An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in Commerce.
f) An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce.
g) All matters must be expressed to be resolved.
h) He who leaves the battlefield first loses by default.
i) Sacrifice is the measure of credibility (No willingness to sacrifice = no liability,
responsibility, authority or measure of conviction.)
j) A lien or claim can be satisfied only through an affidavit by a point-for-point rebuttal, or by payment in full.

1. All are presumed to know the law and ignorance of the law is no excuse.

2. Fraud and Justice never dwell together.

3. I am middle aged and am competent to make this affidavit.

4. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.

5. I am my own flesh and blood, breathing woman on the land of the Americas being and not a government created legal fiction.

6. I recognize the Constitution of 1787, the Bill of Rights (1776), ratified in 1791, and
   Precedent decisions of Article III Justice Courts of Law, and the Law Merchant.

7. The Law Merchant being the foundation of Commercial Law based upon certain eternally just, valid, and moral precepts and truth, which have remained unchanged for six thousand (6,000) years, having its roots in Mosaic Law.

8. Said Commercial Law forms the underpinnings of Western Civilization, if not all Nation’s Law and Commerce in this world.

9. Commercial Law is non-judicial and is superior to, the basis of, and can not be set aside or overruled by the statutes of any governments, Legislatures, Governmental or Quasi-Governmental Agencies, Courts, Judges, and law enforcement agencies, which are under an inherent obligation to uphold said Commercial Law by my hand below.

Declaration of Karen Hudes

1. I, Karen Hudes, declare that the following is true, correct and not meant to mislead to the best of my knowledge:

2. The liability for nonfeasance, malfeasance, and for malfeasance in office is in
   his/her ‘private’ capacity, not his/her official capacity.

3. I am Acting General Counsel of the IBRD and Legal Counsel to TVM-LSM-666, which contains the monetary gold reserves and other assets of the United States and other members of the IBRD and IMF. I am one of the seven (7) individuals authorized by the IBRD and IMF Board of Governors to oversee assets of TVM-LSM-666 on behalf of humanity, beneficiary of TVM-LSM-666
   https://nbakay.wordpress.com/2017/08/15/karen-hudes-whistleblower-both-gen-dunford-and-trump-are-bankrupt-traitors-n-korea-not-descending-in-wwiii-bankers-exposed/
   

WHAT IS A COMMERCIAL LIEN? Do You Know.
March 17, 2016 • 10 Likes • 1 Comment
The Commercial Lien Process

What is a Commercial Lien?

If someone has 'wronged' you, by their actions, you have a remedy, in Law. The Common Law is the Law-of-the-Land, and is the highest man-made Law under which the People of the Nation are bound.

Under the Common Law, everyone is individually responsible for their own actions. The 'office' they may hold, the 'authority' they may consider they have, and/or the uniform they may wear, does not protect them in any way, shape, form. Simply because they (like everyone else) are responsible for every action they take. This was set into tablets of stone following Word War II, at the Nuremberg Trials. German Officers claimed "I was only obeying orders", yet they were still found guilty, and hung accordingly. This also forms a part of the Geneva Convention to which most Countries are signatories, especially the United Kingdom. Thus "I was only obeying orders" is not a defence.

The reasoning is simple: BEFORE taking any actions against anyone else, make sure that what you are doing is lawful and moral. If you suspect that the action you have been ordered to take is either unlawful or immoral, then you must refuse to obey. You can report the order, and your reasons for believing it to be unlawful and/or immoral to a higher authority. You can go as high as you like in the chain of authority, pointing out that anyone who conspires to support the unlawful/immoral order are making themselves accomplices, in Law. And that, as a consequence, they (themselves) will be held fully accountable, in Law.

The Process itself

In simple terms you write down The Exact Truth of what occurred, based on your first-hand knowledge, including any necessary supporting documentation. You will be writing under penalty of perjury, so do not lie, or make any Statements you feel you cannot prove. You explain the 'wrong', and you claim damages. You claim damages that you feel you deserve.

You write this in the form of a sworn Affidavit, and send it to whoever 'wronged' you, giving them 30 days to rebut what you have said. You tell them that you will remove any Statements they can prove to be incorrect, but the result (after all removals) will be Notarised and placed on to the Public Record.

You must take this step. Because it is honourable, and you must remain in honour. You cannot expect a Commercial Lien to work if you cannot prove this step. Thus your Notice should be sent by Recorded Delivery, such that you can prove it was received. If you do not take this step you can expect your collar to be felt at some later date because it is essential, and the essence of the Common Law, that a Party you consider offended you has the chance put their side of the story, and you must not deny them that chance.

It is very important to remember how the Common Law works. This is solely by Verdicts of Juries (upon hearing first-hand knowledge-based evidence) and by unrebutted Statements of Truth (also based solely upon first-hand knowledge).

What remains unrebutted, in substance, creates The Truth, in Law. (This is the only way the Law can work. It relies on people being truthful, with the possibility of perjuring themselves if they lie). Note that 'in substance' does not mean 'simple denial' as in "No, I didn't!". 'In substance' means denial with supporting proof. (And remember "I was only obeying orders" is not 'proof', nor is it any kind of defence. Neither, by the way, is "I didn't know" - because ignorance of the Law is no excuse. They should have checked, and discovered whether or not their actions were lawful and/or moral, before doing whatever they did).

Being The Truth, in Law, it immediately becomes The Judgement, in Law.

This is why, as a Witness, you are required to swear to: "Tell The Truth, the Whole Truth, and nothing but The Truth". Simply because all judgements are based on that. (I repeat ... it is the only way the Law can work).

Now that you have an Affidavit that remains unrebutted, you can get it notarised by a Notary Public. 'Notarising' consists of identifying yourself to the Notary (Passport, Driving Licence, etc), and signing your Affidavit in his or her presence ... such that he or she can verify that it was you, yourself, making your signature. The Notary will apply his seal, and will sign accordingly. (Their fees for doing this range from £30 to £50 on average).

All you need to do from this point onward is to 'place the fact that your Affidavit exists on to the Public Record'. This can be done by talking out a small advertisement in a newspaper. Within the advertisement you can invite Debt Collection Agencies to contact you - in order to actually exercise the Commercial Lien debt.

What can the Lienee do about this?

Judges know that they cannot affect a Commercial Lien because it is based on first-hand knowledge, which they can never have. Only you can have that knowledge. Only you can make the Statements you made. Thus there is nothing for them to 'judge', and they know that.

The Lienee, therefore has three options:

1. To pay up the full amount you have demanded

2. To engage a Common Law Court, with a Jury of 12, to have their side of the story considered. In this Court you will also be able to explain your side of the story to the Jury. The Jury has the power to wipe away your Lien (if, for example, they don't believe what you stated), or to modify the amount you have demanded (if they think it was unreasonable). This is because the whole process derives from the Common Law (Note: Not Statute Law, which is subsidiary to Common Law!)

3. To wait 99 years with the Lien hanging over their head. However, within this period, you can progress your Lien via Debt Collection Agencies and Credit Reference Agencies.

Who can you take out a Lien against?

Anyone you feel who has wronged you - or conspired to wrong you. For example, the Directors of a Company who have made demands upon you, without a Contract of Obligation from you. For example, all Debt Collection Agencies who simply write, demanding money, when you have never heard of them before, and know that you have no obligation to 'do business' with them. They may write on the basis of a Parking Fine, or whatever. The point is they do this without having first obtained a lawful obligation from you. They may very well claim a Warrant from the Northampton Bulk Clearing Centre, but you never consented to be 'judged' at Northampton Bulk Clearing Centre (and were never given any opportunity to put your side of the story). Furthermore the Warrant is not based on the Verdict of a Jury, or sworn Affidavit from first-hand knowledge (computers do not have first-hand knowledge!). So any such Warrant is void in Law. Consequently, if they continually harass you, they are (seriously and criminally!) 'wronging' you.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/commercial-liens-dr-joseph-smith

What is a Commercial Lien?

A lien is very similar to a mortgage. It says that one person owes another person money, and, if the money isn't paid, then the money is to be collected when the property is sold.

Suppose you borrow $100,000 from a bank to start a business. With that $100,000, you buy a lot of office equipment. Unlike an automobile or real estate, there is no document showing who owns the equipment. Therefore, how does the bank make sure it gets any money from the sale of the office equipment?

The bank files a document at the court house saying that, if the office equipment is sold, then the bank should get any money from the sale. That document is a lien.

Or, suppose you were a contractor and you did $100,000 worth of work to someone's house. If the owner refused to pay, you can file a document at the court house which says, "If the house is sold, then I am entitled to $100,000.00 for work." That is another type of lien.

Those are both examples of commercial liens.

When someone files a lien at the court house, no one checks whether the document is legal. It is simply filed. There is also no notice sent to the person against whom the lien is claimed.

Pretty simple, really. It works amazingly well.

How does someone "game" the system?

Suppose Joe claims that you owe violated his constitutional right because you didn't smile at him on Sunday. Therefore, he says that you own him $25,000.00. So, he prepares a lien for $25,000 and files it at the courthouse. The lien is complete nonsense, of course. But, the people at the court house file it anyway. (To be clear, the people at the court house have very limited power to refuse to file any documents.)

Two year later, you try to sell your house. The lien shows up on the title report for your house. Until you resolve the lien, a bank will not lend money to buy the house. No one will buy the house.

This, of course, causes you a great deal of inconvenience and anguish. You are forced to go to court to have a judge declare the lien void. You have to hire a lawyer. This takes time and money.

Alternatively, you could call up Joe and offer him $5000.00 to see if he will release the lien.

So, people who feel that they have been somehow wronged by the government go out and file illegal liens against individuals within the government. This causes some people a great deal of heartache.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-Commercial-Lien