The version of Christian providentialism and in the twentieth

"
The version of Christian providentialism and in the twentieth century somehow that's all this ceased to arrange and ceased to arrange. I think that amid the disappointment of the big idea of ​​progress. And first of all I ponied this disappointment with a scale such against the background of two world wars against the backdrop of such harsh very owerful totalitarian regimes on and easier of course this background argues that some when here is an owl and the dead in the gas chamber of the furnace Vok on this background argue that we are progressing that we are getting closer to someone's ideal co The state became so strange that a huge rosokhan appeared in the evening, probably the 20th century, if the age is 18 19 this time utopia is the 20th century, this is sooner the time of anti-utopia. Here it is revolutionism that it ceased to arrange, and again here there is some removal of responsibility from a person like you personally, nothing depends on history, some objective laws are moving some kind of superhuman forces and it seems as if it is not clear And what about a single person to make a personal warehouse can be even on a Marx to which seems to be with such a roar olyutsionnym pathos built his social philosophy on Marx, we can only accelerate or slow down the movement of history by the beaten track which song We can not do this way Besides, it began to somehow disagree with the already accumulated sociological knowledge that society is very different and they are very differently arranged slightly so that the large form of which woman such a road can be talked besides emerged an anti-colonial social philosophy which resisted a different kind of modernization theory because at the basis the theory of modernization of the pressure that there is one right road and all the societies that deviate from this road are needed for some reason yes And they need to return to this road Only in the framework of this Zara alone, strictly speaking, can develop again we come to the problem of criteria for progress Just some societies may not be progressive enough While there are common criteria for the concept of progress