RE: Mixed Messages.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Mixed Messages.

in psychology •  7 years ago 

Thanks to Rudd's apology, they seem to be the only kids that don't get snatched on a whim.

They actually make up the majority of kids in the care system. I think they tend to take them from the reserves, though, from families who've already been destroyed by the governmental abuse done through the ages. There's no argument that a lot of kids are in bad situations there, just no acknowledgement as to how they got to that point.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Rudd never apologised - The fake apology was well scripted - what Rudd said was "we say sorry" not "I am sorry" or "we are sorry" - big difference lawfully speaking - If he had said "I am sorry" that would be an admission of guilt and his business would be legally and lawfully bound to give just and fair compensation to those harmed - including prison sentences for kidnapping and false imprisonment -
By not apologising / admitting guilt, his business gets away with it - he just throws tax payer money at the victims and families which stops the families from moving against the government in a law case.
Very clever fraud by Rudd and his business - i'd say 99.9% of people was tricked by social media to believe it real and fell for it.......