Good point, that is a possibility, but I'm convinced that they would know better. Not just because of some altruistic idea, or anything romantic like that.
But because if they were to show themselves as tyrants (which I don't believe them to be) people would effectively exodus.
No one would leave. No one ever leaves Steemit.
No matter how shitty things get, it’s still free money.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"...Welcome to the hotel, California.."
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hah, you got it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm sure you've read the crabs in the bucket metaphor... pretty ugly mind you, but interesting nonetheless (it's in the white paper)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Heh. I liked reading that for some reason. It claims it was the solution to address the problem of the multi-party prisoner's dilemma concerning countering self-votes / growth-inhibiting behavior. Guess we're not crabby enough.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
hahahhaha I don't know if you meant that as a joke, but it came out comical.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's half joke, half serious :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit