Today is September 11th, 2019. On this date in 2001, the Twin Towers in New York City were destroyed in an act of terrorism. Even then, it never really felt like something personal. Yes, it's a cultural center, the headquarters of major media, the setting for numerous works of fiction, and an architectural icon, but I never felt the burning hatred of a personal attack. Sure, I was a nationalist then who thought it was a black eye to all Americans and warranted hitting them back. Yes, I joined in the patriotic war fever and was swayed by the hawks eager to lay waste to entire countries where the accused masterminds might reside nonetheless.
I eventually began to be drawn into the conspiracy theories and what-if scenarios that the tinfoil-hat crowd espoused. I still have a measure of scepticism about the official story, but I'm hardly in the "CIA/Mossad/who-knows-who-else did it" camp. The alternative "explanations" have too much speculation and require too much suspension of disbelief. Secret nukes? No. Thermite? Maybe. Space laser death rays? No. Fake planes with crisis actors? Hell of a lot of witnesses to conscript and then keep quiet, dontcha think?
Over time, my doubts about the official story and the myriad alternative theories led me to seriously explore a lot of my core beliefs and preconceptions about politics, governments, nationalism, and the merits of various self-professed dissenters. I grew weary of Alex Jones long before he became the widely-known laughingstock he is today. I do give him some credit though in introducing me to many libertarian-leaning voices that still merit my respect despite their association with him as guests on his show. It was through people like Ron Paul and some more level-headed members of now-long-defunct web forums who helped me sort my thoughts on the matter and build a better foundation from which to expand my knowledge.
Maybe the 9/11 attacks happened pretty much as the government says. Maybe it shouldn't have collapsed based on the initial engineering, but maybe contractors skimped on concrete and steel quality to save some money and pocket a bonus during construction. Apparently there were some issues with the current Orwellian "Freedom Tower" resulting in demolition of prior work during construction due to materials that did not meet spec. This could also explain the alleged haste with which the rubble was cleared and disposed of, all without any need to claim thermite or nukes. This is mere armchair speculation, though. I can only reserve judgement.
Maybe the CIA, Mossad, and Bush administration, possibly continuing some policy from the Clinton era, engaged in an act of terrorism against the United States as a means to incite war. In hindsight, it would have worked as expected. However, there is a dearth of hard evidence. Connecting random dots can create patterns that aren't really there, and those connecting these dots have open prejudice toward their intended conclusions from the outset. Someone would have brought forth some kind of evidence over the past 18 years, I think. Governments are not really very good at keeping secrets, especially over any significant length of time.
All of this is just speculation from someone who sees New York City as effectively a foreign country. They use the same language, mostly, but so does London. They use the same currency, but so what? I don't go there. They produce a lot of media, but I don't consume much of it. They are a major economic center, and that certainly affects me. Their culture, values, politics, and lifestyle is still utterly foreign to a country boy from the west. The attack on the Pentagon hasn't figured as highly in peoples' memories as the Twin Towers collapsing. In my opinion, if it was a bunch of middle easterners mad at US foreign policy, it was a perfectly legitimate military target for a military attack. Using a passenger airliner negates any moral sanctuary in that position though, if that was what was really used... [cue X-files theme]
I have since come to understand that government, democratic representation, and republican checks and balances are all a mirage. There is no virtue in politics. The real conspiracy doesn't need to be found by examining photos or low-res video. It is taught in textbooks as part of our national mythology. I saw the absurdity of advocating the deaths of thousands of innocent foreigners in revenge for the death of thousands of innocent Americans, regardless of who controlled the planes or how the towers fell. I still think the disposal of Bin Laden's body was sketchy. The war in Iraq has been a series of clusterfucks creating mass murder that continues to this day. The entangling alliances and petty vendettas in DC have led to arming terrorists and supporting genocide. These are all done in my name, if there is anything to democracy, but it is without my consent.
In the upcoming election cycle, we will have voters who weren't even born before 9/11/01, much less have any recollection of a time before gate rape and porno-scanners to fly anywhere. They won't remember a time when passports were not required to visit Canada. There's no realization that blowback from US foreign policy created the "terrorist threat" in the first place, or that the current policy just continues spreading that web of hate that could blow back on us again. Their only memories are war and destruction, but it's all conveniently "over there." After all, destruction and death on the scale of many 9/11s doesn't count if it's happening to someone else.
But aside from the consequences of the warfare state and police state here, 9/11/01 NYC is still just "somewhere else" to me, too. . .
Sorry if this is disjointed and incoherent. It's a lightly-edited stream-of-consciousness word jumble, nothing more.
I decided I wasn't going to acknowledge or reference that anniversary in any way this year. It's clear-- the terrorists won. Liberty is pretty much illegal in America, just as it was claimed they wanted.
I've (apparently) never written of my personal experiences of that day. Maybe I should some time.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It used to be "history is written by the victors" but that has morphed to "history is written by the corporations". All one has to do is look at the INSANE amounts of money funneled into a handful of corps for "the war effort" post 9/11. Who was to benefit most from a tragedy hitting home soil? Those that supply the materials for the subsequent war. How this has eluded so many in this culture is amazing, but then again people tend to be easy to fool.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The military-industrial complex certainly won big, but I think it was likely more a case of warmongers capitalizing on tragedy to drive more intervention, and not someone instigating a black flag attack for political power or profit. But I can't be certain of that, now can I?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It ALWAYS pays to follow the money. Greed is a seriously strong motivator for many atrocities through history.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The way things are today, with people so highly strung, I hate to even get involved in any debates or step on any toes. I just see along the same lines as the moon landing. Pure and simple trying to keep the number of people that would have known silent for so long seems totally impossible. If a secret is shared in a group of three, chances are pretty good it will be leaked by at least 2 lol!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The podcast Our Fake History had an interesting series exploring the moon landing hoax conspiracy. Spoiler: The host is not persuaded by the conspiracy theory arguments.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
and we forget, that there was another building that collapsed at 9.11
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am well aware of WTC7, and that collapse is strange. I do have just enough knowledge of architecture and engineering to be dangerous in a professional setting. But the absence of evidence makes any alternative explanation a bit difficult to demonstrate. It remains a peculiarity among many on that day.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Mayby it is "strange" because it isn't a collapse but we all witnessed a phenomenon unknown to us because never seen before?
Please take a look to last @mes post, that is a 7 years old conference based on evidence widely underestimated: https://steempeak.com/dtube/@mes/pi7ajlot0fy
A huge hug! 🤗
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Fortunately, there is recently confirmed evidence that it was not a fire which led to the collapse of the 150m high building.
https://salsa3.salsalabs.com/o/50694/signup_page/uaf-wtc7-draft-report?killorg=True&loggedOut=True
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit