Raymond Patterson - Understanding Covered vs. Naked Options

in raymond •  4 months ago 

Options by strike price classification
When comparing the strike price to the current stock price, there are two scenarios: higher than the current stock price (Covered) and lower than the current stock price (Naked). So, options with different strike prices can be classified into 8 types:

Long Covered Call
Buying a call option with a strike price > stock price.
Long Naked Call
Buying a call option with a strike price < stock price.
Sell Covered Call
Selling a call option with a strike price > stock price.
Sell Naked Call
Selling a call option with a strike price < stock price.
Long Covered Put
Buying a put option with a strike price > stock price.
Long Naked Put
Buying a put option with a strike price < stock price.
Sell Covered Put
Selling a put option with a strike price > stock price.
Sell Naked Put
Selling a put option with a strike price < stock price.
The reason for this classification is that the significance behind whether the strike price is higher (Covered) or lower (Naked) than the stock price is very different.

image_2024-07-05_12-19-45.png

Long Naked Call
Let’s take Long Naked Call (buying a call option with a strike price < stock price) as an example. I believe Long Naked Call is essentially like adding extra leverage to buying a stock.

For example, let’s say a stock is priced at $100, and you buy a call option with a strike price of $50. Since the strike price is $50 and the stock price is $100, the strike price < stock price, making this a Long Naked Call. Because the option’s strike price is $50 less than the stock price, the premium for this option won’t be cheap; it will definitely be above $50. If the premium were less than $50, your cost to exercise (strike price + premium) would be less than the stock price, which wouldn’t make sense for the counterparty. For someone to be willing to trade with you, the premium must be higher than $50.

Let’s assume the premium is $60. So, the cost to buy this option is $60. In this case:

If the stock rises 50% to $150, your profit is $40, and the return is 40/60 = +67%.
If the stock drops 50% to $50, your loss is $60, and the return is -60/60 = -100%.
Now, if you bought the stock instead of the option:

If the stock rises 50% to $150, your profit is $50, and the return is 50/100 = +50%.
If the stock drops 50% to $50, your loss is $50, and the return is -50/100 = -50%.
As you can see, compared to directly buying the stock, your return with the option is almost like having double leverage. But it’s not exactly double leverage because the premium has a time value, which means you paid an extra cost.

Long Covered Call
The significance behind a Long Covered Call is quite different.

For example, if a stock is priced at $100, and you buy a call option with a strike price of $110, this is a Long Covered Call because the strike price > stock price. The premium for this option won’t be as high as in the previous example. Let’s assume it’s $10.

So, if you buy this option for $10:

If the stock rises 50% to $150, because the strike price + premium will be greater than the stock price and the strike price is fixed at $110, the premium will rise to at least $40. The return is (150-110-10)/10 = +300%.
If the stock rises 20% to $120, your return is (120-110-10)/10 = 0%.
If the stock rises 10% to $110, your return is (110-110-10)/10 = -100%.
In fact, since your strike price is $110, unless the stock rises more than 10%, your return is -100%.

As you can see, the leverage effect of a Long Covered Call is very different from that of a Long Naked Call.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!