RE: Universal Basic Income Is Not in the Constitution

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Universal Basic Income Is Not in the Constitution

in realestate •  7 years ago 

Hey @humanearl, very interesting question you are asking.
I don’t think I can answer it for you, however I can present you with my opinion.
I agree with you there should always be “Consumers” for “Makers” to exist. Basic economy is founded on this principle – “Supply” and “Demand”.
That said, if you become a “Maker” do you then suddenly seize to exist as a “Consumer”?
See, in my opinion we cannot look at it as just a straight swap.
If I for example build my own economy by providing ideas, goods or services other consume, then it does not mean that I suddenly stop consuming myself. I still have to eat. I still need a roof over my head. I still desire entertainment. No matter what economic system, people will always Consume.
However, being non-reliant on any third party for creating your income, allows what I will call “Free consumption” – which all people can achieve. Granted for some it will always be much harder due to circumstances ect.
Then a final thought. It is human nature that only a small percentage will ever dare to be different than the rest. No matter how many courses, seminars or tools – from masters like Grant – most people will always look externally for hope instead of internally. So most people will never live the life they are supposed to.
Not sure if my ramblings make any sense.
Have a blessed day.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

You are right in that you will contiune to consume even when you become a "Maker". I think using what you make can definitely help. In other words 'produce to use'. Most people are not producers and consumers they are mostly just consumers.

Makes sense.

Really great answer was thinking the exact same thing!