![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://thaipad.maahalai.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Steppy-Pants.jpg)
Source
This is certainly not the first time that I have attempted to establish a following. In some form or other I've been trying to do so for a good decade. At various points I have paused to ask myself "what is the point?".
I never truly had an adequate answer. It was purely about self-expression.
But the thing about self-expression is that it isn't a scheduled thing.
It doesn't come in bite-sized morsels that translate well to all mediums.
And Steemit Hasn't Been Giving Me Good Vibes.
Nobody likes to hear criticism - and I'm not even going to delve into the demoralizing element of having comments, up-votes and other efforts vanish to a system that is unable to cope with the pressures that it is being subjected to.
No, rather I'm going to (again) take a poke at those who feel that engaging in self-up-votes and circular voting is in some way a valid form of 'content curation'.
Rather, I am going to take a poke at those who treat their up-vote not as a curation tool but as an investment tool.
Oh look! A really interesting post! Lets not up-vote for a bit because of the 30-minute rule. And lets pay more attention to the Reputation, Steem Power and Number of Followers that a user has than the content that this user has chosen to grace the blockchain with.
Whether such be a well-edited earth-shaking revelation... or a 60-second meme text inserted to an image (probably not taken by oneself) to make it a 'derivative work'. Or equivalent...
And we, the unfavored many, get to watch as their modest efforts (and this is putting it kindly) consistently elicit a gush of contrived generosity.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B_6nVqiWEAEAsfq.jpg:large)
Source
And then we get to ask ourselves... "Why?"
Especially when we surpass Reputation 52 and are no longer eligible to the lightning strikes of likes of @curie. Never mind that reputation is not a reliable indicator of one who is able to get by on his or her own Steem - pun intended.
Its like finding your way down an endless dark tunnel on a raft with a spent solar powered pulse engine, with the current pulling you ever deeper and further away from the light as our hands splash ineffectively in the water.
Steemit's 7-day Payout Period Supports This
One can publish anything to Steemit - and make cents for one's effort.
Better than facebook or just about any other potential location for blogging or self-publishing... but is this all that its cracked up to be?
Here is a conundrum for all to ponder.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://media.giphy.com/media/c7PcKQlOqZ8Ws/giphy-facebook_s.jpg)
Source
The value of our content (or more accurately, the speculation surrounding the perceived value of our content collectively) is part of what gives the Steem blockchain value. However there exists a 7-day payout. Suggesting that the value of information is confined to a seven day period.
Right...
Something does not quite add up.
And that which doesn't add up is the effort-to-rewards ratio.
Which leads to a bit of a wake-up call.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://grassyknoll.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/millennials-5-comics-reveal-the-truth-vs-reality.jpg)
Source
If it truly is the case that content is voted upon not on the basis of its quality but rather as part of a calculated effort in investment - then there truly isn't any point in delivering more than the Steemit platform itself is sending signals that it deserves.
Even now I wonder if I've placed too much effort upon this post.
But then again, like I said earlier, inspiration doesn't come in the shape and dose requested. Sometimes self-expression has a value all of its own.
And - in recognition of that which I have observed upon Steemit - I shall begin to 'live down' to expectations. After all - the problem isn't with those who have got it good - but with the rest of us.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://i.pinimg.com/170x/d8/2c/d9/d82cd93771fbe7a2ae7147450a150463--hobbes-calvin-calvin-and-hobbes-quotes.jpg)
Source
If you found this post interesting and would like to share this with your followers and friends then a resteem is always appreciated.
If you have some feedback for me then feel free to share your views in comments. A civil conversation can go a long way.
Sincerely,
Previous Post: Fire Destroys and Fire Cleanses - Reflecting Upon an Assassination
From my observations, a big chunk of the upvoting activities on Steem has become automated. Moreover, the hot-tab has become full of self-upvoted posts through bots such as minnowbooster. All this must be decreasing the value of Steem, as this blockchain was supposed to be about human interaction and not automation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you kindly, @irreverent-dan, both for your up-vote as well as your very pertinent comment.
Yes - I too have noticed that automated vote services have come into vogue. I also figured out a long time ago that it does not make any logical sense for a whale to touch anything other than a fellow whale - at least from an investments standpoint.
And yes, the increase in automated vote services has not been kind to Steem's value. Its like enlisting a robotic curator at library that then proceeds to mark each and every book as 'Good read' - with very few books marked 'A terrific read' independently of whether they really are great books ~(and less independently of the odds of pleasing the stakeholders of the hypothetical library in question.
Thanks again!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ever since I past the 53 Rep score, I barely get any substantial payouts anymore. Oh well, I write because one must do what one needs to do.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I had a feeling that Reputation 53 was a more common tipping point. It is good to see that I'm not the only one who has noticed.
Thank you - both for your upvote as well as your comment. :c)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"me, me, me, me.... me too"
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
right on time
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
To be fair I actually signed up for the qurator service. :c)
Less-so the sometimes 'annoying' vote-trail that has since begun to tail it. I haven't been bothered enough to see if I can opt out. At least its not, to the best of my knowledge, a fully-automated service and I like to think that they are actually doing some level of curation.
However your point is well-taken. :c)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Removed as double-posted due to the above-mentioned reliability issues. :c)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit