My point is that the Bible is a work of fiction, not fact. I appreciate that some good can come out of some of its stories, but you're kidding yourself if you believe the origin is anything other than creative writing mixed with ignorance of the reality behind extraordinary events. By that I mean floods, comets and so on.
RE: Entropy vs Christ (A scientific basis for Jesus Christ Part II)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Entropy vs Christ (A scientific basis for Jesus Christ Part II)
But admit it, you are assuming it is a work of fiction despite it's being presented by earnest and credible men as eyewitness accounts of real events that they were willing to die rather than recant.
It's your right to assume its fiction. It's also your loss. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit