"That the swarm redistribution "pulse" can be done in segments is a way to manage GAS costs and potential transaction size limitations (with that, block size limitations on Ethereum are no problem. )"what is the case with bitcoin?I need to get this clear@johan-nyren.
RE: Decrease reward from swarm redistribution with distance from pulse origin
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Decrease reward from swarm redistribution with distance from pulse origin
Bitcoin is an older technology, Ethereum was a 2.0 which added smart contracts, an idea from 1997 and Nick Szabo. It had not been possible to develop Nick Szabo's idea before Craig Wright invented mining (proof-of-work) for global consensus, which provided a medium where smart contracts could live. Both Bitcoin and Ethereum are quite outdated at this point, have a look at BitLattice if you are interested in the next generation,
https://steemit.com/informo/@johan-nygren/bitlattice-as-ethereum-2-0-and-how-sharding-required-a-new-state-topology
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit