How social rules are always determined. The negative effects are usually decided by the collective town/group you are in.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-anarchy-works
I usually use this as a reference to places it has worked peacefully. There are many example from throughout history.
I'll certainly will read the link you provide. Essentially you oppose the technology implementation of a de-centralised government, but go back to local communities who decide together how they will live together, correct?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The communities don't have to be local, often they can span what would have before been considered a country.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Understood indeed, but at least geographically members will be located in group(s) without other groups with other social rules and norms mixing in.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That is partially true. Many groups that are close together often intermingle. Boarders are a creation of the state and people would otherwise travel freely. The internet will also allow people to interconnect and share their ideals.
Many different subgroups in a single anarchist region have existed, but they have always gotten along peacefully enough so that different norms are not a problem. Think about how much interaction people from different areas have online today.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree with the fact people with different ideas can love together, but it becomes an issue when ideas are to far apart. But I understand where you are coming from. Thank you for your comments AND link!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit