RE: The royal family - Epstein and links to pedophiles

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The royal family - Epstein and links to pedophiles

in royals •  5 years ago 

Indeed. Somebody has to pay the piper....one really didn't believe it'd be those the most complicit.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

From information floating about, including what the USA lady Journalist said, he made his fortune from blackmail. So enough very wealthy (not to be confused with rich) people wanted him dead! A prison guard is the ideal "patsy" to take the blame, and defenseless at that.

I am skeptical of the blackmail claim. He just had to many rich people willing to hang out with him freely. Word that he was a black mailer would travel fast, no one would associate themselves with him. Think of the depth of that, many of these people could have easily had him taken out if he threatened blackmail against them. People with power and status usually don't go up against one another unless you want to be crushed or your reputation lost so even if some were in disagreement with what was going on they stayed silent. One hand turns another among the elites. Claiming blackmail would be a great excuse for those who found themselves soured about something they went along with for years and/or work as a good excuse for those being accused of being complicit in their silence. You'd have to become more powerful than all of them combined , an untouchable of sorts to bring a man like that down. I can't help but think that's what happened here with Trump, Trump had a dislike for Epstein that was well known. I think he brought in Acosta to his administration and used him to find leverage that laid a underground network that helped propel the cases against him forward. These cases that languished for years under previous administrations who wouldn't go up against the Clinton machine, Trump had no quarrels about exposing the Clintons for who they really were. Plus if you are going to find yourself having to play some dirty pool it surely doesn't hurt to have the low down on your opponents, actual evidence doesn't hurt either. My self assessment is when it came to the Clintons and Epstein Trump came in like a wrecking ball.

Have you heard Amy?

She may have had what she thought was everything but not everything Roberts was selling was true. As was the case with Dershowitz who sued her lawyers. The lawyers dropped their case against him after he proved he was elsewhere during the times she alleged she had sex with him. I also doubt her accusations against Trump because Trump had Epstein banished from his resorts after he tried recruiting woman there and Bill Richardson was so disgusted by what he witnessed at a home Epstein owned in New Mexico that he ordered his campaign staff to return all contributions to his campaign back to Epstein.

I believe she participated in the activities there, I am sorry she choose to live her life like that as much as I despise he opted to use her that way but it's pretty hard for me to be all sympathetic to one side the equation here as these were choices made that lead one to ask "where were these girls parents?", "why if they were being held against their will did they not pick up a phone and call home to claim they were being held against their will?...it's not like they didn't have access to phones. People makes choices and the one girl I'd be willing to believe is the one who was fourteen who lived with her dad who died of an overdose and was easily swayed (recruited) to make money giving Epstein massages. After several massages he forcible raped her. She never went back. You see the key words there? She never went back. This guy had all the money in the world, he didn't need to hold anybody against their will. The fact that Epstein paid her off and she came back forward, to me, reeks of blackmail on her behalf.

I may view these things differently than some women and men but I have spent a lifetime watching women sell themselves out for an advantage. No one ever has sympathy for those whom these types of women make life a lot harder for so I in return have selective feelings in some of these cases involving Epstein and a few women making these accusations. I put all that forth with the fact that as a child we lived in a house of prostitution after my parents divorced which is why protective services took us away. Moving forward years later and the choices bestowed upon us I could have just as easily chose the same path my older sister went down and became a prostitute or a stripper like my little sister but I didn't. These were our teen years just as like some of these girls. No one really forces us to make the decisions we make but we live with the consequences of our choices we technically can't lay all the blame on others. I constantly argue this point with one of my older sisters daughter. She says I am cruel about the way I talk about her mother because she suffered more abuse. She doesn't understand that my older sister was continually offered more help than anyone of us but she still choose the path she chose. That's the reality of it.

Your view on women is refreshing, if I said the same it opens me up to being called silly names.

Was the reporter Amy one of his victims? If so I did not know that part.

Believe me some have rung me through the ringer for my opinion(s) but they've never experienced the other side of the equation of it all.

No she wasn't a victim she was a reporter that talked to Roberts.