RE: Just another day in the neighborhood.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Just another day in the neighborhood.

in rulebyforce •  6 years ago 

I guess it was legal to rape and murder women more of them would be married or live with their relatives but I think our current system is better although it needs a LOT of improvement.
Is some places where there is a lot of freedom warlords form. I think limited government is the best option.
I do support seatbelt usage but I don't think we should fine people for not doing it unless they don't buckle up their children.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

unless they don't buckle up their children.

Dont rebel against slavery, its for the children?
Really?

For legal rape just look at muslims, girls are married by twelve and dont leave home without a male relative.

I support protecting children. I'm not saying police should spend all day looking for unbuckled children though but perhaps a $20 fine.

Under anarchy that would be legal.

Nobody would force them, that would be to enslave them.
Darwin awards keep the gene pool stronger.

If it wasn't for USA tax slaves extremist Muslims would probably have control of the entire Middle East right now and more. I disagree with a lot of extremist Islam but they don't believe in usury which is very powerful so in general Christians might qualify more for Darwinian awards than the extremist Muslims who would probably already have thousands of Christian slaves if not for USA tax slaves.

Under anarchy I think Muslims would currently be the big winners. I guess if you're Ok with sharia law then it would be good to support "anarchy" but sharia law is not anarchy.

Rule by force doesnt fly with anarchists.
If christians get so dumbed down that they let others rule them by force they want to be enslaved.
Free people fight for their freedom.
My bet is if the bush/clinton crime family hadnt ruled the united snakes since they killed kennedy we wouldnt be having these problems.
The cia funds radical islam for a variety of reasons, no rational society would have anything to do with them.
Most folks just want to live in peace.

So anarchists would band together like a quasi government?
It's hard to keep track of everything the CIA does but I think extremist Islam would have had a shot even without the CIA. Some of the leaders we supported like Saddam and the Saudis were not as extreme.

So anarchists would band together like a quasi government?

well, except for the kill you if you don't comply part.
There will be plenty of nosy neighbors willing to let you mind your own business provided you do the same.
Think you can mind your own business?

Some of the leaders we supported like Saddam and the Saudis were not as extreme.

You do know the bushes go back 4 generations at the highest offices of power?
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/

Or did your teacher skim over that part?
They don't much like to mention it.

About 30,000 people get murdered in the USA. If police were out to murder innocent civilians that number would be way higher.
I knew it was at least 3.