Great report 👏 👍 I don’t think much of the 5.56 X 45 NATO round and its weak piece of crap 💩 M-16 and M-4 . I’ve always said that the .308 or 7.62 X 51 NATO in the M-1 grand or M-14 was a better battle rifle . The M-16 always suffered from lack of range and kinetic energy to stop the enemies . The M-4 especially has gotten a bad reputation for only alerting the enemies of where they are , and not being able to reach them with rounds falling very short of any enemies . This had to have been very frustrating for American troops especially out in AFGHANISTAN 🇦🇫 where range is critical .
Great report 👏 👍 I don’t think much of the 5.56 X 45 NATO round and its weak piece of crap 💩 M-16 and M-4 . I’ve always said that the .308 or 7.62 X 51 NATO in the M-1 grand or M-14 was a better battle rifle . The M-16 always suffered from lack of range and kinetic energy to stop the enemies . The M-4 especially has gotten a bad reputation for only alerting the enemies of where they are , and not being able to reach them with rounds falling very short of any enemies . This had to have been very frustrating for American troops especially out in AFGHANISTAN 🇦🇫 where range is critical .
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit