if you look at the viuly whitepaper says nothing about actual function and has 6 pages dedicated to marketing and the ICO with no technical
https://viuly.com/Viuly_Whitepaper.pdf
RE: ICO Review : Viewly Vs Viuly?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
ICO Review : Viewly Vs Viuly?
IPFS is an established technology. No need to waste pages on a tech that most savvy crypto people already understand Ruslan (CEO) wanted to keep the whitepaper simple and readable for content creators such as yourself to understand and get excited about the platform. Clearly, it was a sound decision. Thank you very much @isacoin for sharing our whitepaper. Apparently it was simple enough for even you to understand.
And for those of you who really hate to read, our platform is 95% complete, so you can just checkout our ALPHA
Competition is healthy for free markets fellas. Don't call us a scam. We don't even call you competition.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If the project really is not a scam, you'll do well to announce a rebranding and make some code public. @furion is an established account in this ecosystem, while you - currently - seem to be at best a copycat.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
from an investment point of view not adding full details lacks transparency what legitimate business seeking millions in funding would not disclose full working of
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit