If you erase the past, the future become non-existent.
Look under electric universe models and aether models.
Along that path, you will find that our current model has so many holes, that it may as well be thrown out just because it is so bad.
Such as, the speed of light is supposed to be the speed limit, but there have been many tests that show speeds in excess of c.
The speed of light, as measured, was changing... until scientists got together and set it.
The theory of relativity breaks down when you accept the presence of entangled particles.
Etc.
And sorry, I really can't do anything but hint at there is more out there.
So, I've heard of the aether model and during my research about it I also saw that it has been disproven through experiments.
And from my very quick look at the electric universe model (and I will admit it was very very quick and not well researched), it seems to be easily disproven even with experiments potentially doable for a science fair in an elementary school.
The speed of light (which is actually a bad name for something that should ideally be called the speed of casualty) is being "ignored" by entangled particles, yes. But that isn't being refuted by physicist, it is being researched and I will not claim I know the answer to why that is happening.
But what I don't understand how it was changing until they "set it". Do Earth's scientists have some magical device that can set it universal constants? If they don't shouldn't it be possible to prove that the speed of light is actually still changing?
And you "hinting at there being more out there" is certainly true. The question is, is what you are proposing to be out there true or is it just your belief which you cannot back with scientific, peer-reviewed and repeatedly experiementally provable. Since you only put out general statements and don't provide any sources at all, I am inclined to say that it is just your belief and not science.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Back before you were born, scientists used to measure the speed of light. In the front of old science books, the current measurement was printed.
And, the speed was slowly changing. Whether that was because of measurement error or the speed changing, we do not know.
THEN (dun dun dunnnnn) the scientist got together and set the speed of light. They decided that 299,792,458 m/s was the speed of light.
It hasn't been measured since then, except as some stunt to show they could still do it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Of course I only "hint" at things. If I was going to write about them, I would be writing books.
Did you notice that all of your "supposed facts" are only because "scientists say so"? I listen and work with scientists that say different.
You also missed, as does almost everybody, that entangled particles destroys the theory of relativity. People just think that the two can coexist. Also, the dual slit experiment further destroys the theory of relativity.
As someone who was writing an article on science, I was hoping that a bit of prodding would get you thinking about why the two are mutually exclusive.
It does look like I got you a lot of steem for writing your replies to my comments. So, there you go.
I will leave you with a banned Ted talk which I believe is the one that goes into scientists stopping measuring the speed of light.
Rupert Sheldrake - The Science Delusion BANNED TED TALK
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit