Why would evolution make it so we only use 10% of an organ and still have the 90% with us? We would've just gotten rid of the extra 90% that we don't need and we would walk around with a wallnut in our heads!
RE: The 10% Myth and what it implies
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The 10% Myth and what it implies
Even "IF" we are just using 10% thank god or "random series of events that made human life possible" that evolution kept the current amount of stuff in our skulls.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's my point, it doesn't make sense.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit