RE: Scientific Evidence Shouldn't Dictate Your Opinion

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Scientific Evidence Shouldn't Dictate Your Opinion

in science •  8 years ago 

Well duh, I am writing an article about this now because you seem to confuse me with lunatics that are against science.

Astrobiology can succeed if first biology takes it there. more on the coming article.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

No, i'm saying that you are dilettante. Can dilettantes be harmful? Yes, they can especially when they begin to decide what disciplines are worth and what aren't.

There were huge problems in the USSR because of the dilettantes. There were oppressions against genetics because of dilettantes that has called them pseudoscientists and pests on the body of science. Next step was to ban cybernetics as a pseudoscience they even started to call that discipline as a "imperialistic whore". You should ask yourself if you have enough qualification and information on the matter to put a shit on it.

No, i'm saying that you are dilettante. Can dilettantes be harmful? Yes, they can especially when they begin to decide what disciplines are worth and what aren't.

And who gets to decide? Academic authority? and based on what? You do have issues with authority after all. You seem to crave it.

There were huge problems in the USSR because of the dilettantes. There were oppressions against genetics because of dilettantes that has called them pseudoscientists and pests on the body of science. Next step was to ban cybernetics as a pseudoscience they even started to call that discipline as a "imperialistic whore". You should ask yourself if you have enough qualification and information on the matter to put a shit on it.

irrelevant. you are now effectively sensational.

Who gets to decide. Obviously not dilettantes like you.

I have no any issues with authorities but you have as far as I can see))) You have some strong negativism towards academicians. I don't have such. I can't even imagine for what reasons i should hate academicians like Leonhard Euler, Lev Landau or Richard Feynmann. You can read more about them if those names new to you.

For example, in USSR in order to became an academician someone should have made an outstanding contribution to the science. Brilliant minds. It's strange for me that someone can accuse me because i admire them. This is sick.

You obviously have issues with English comprehension. not going to continue this. Like i said, level up.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

you repeated that 10 times. here is a flag for you so you can think before you speak next time.

You are ignorant dilettante. Your position is really weak, there's logical fallacies in your statement. That's why you have turned to those shitty comments.

You seem angry. Go outside and take some fresh our. The butthurt should ease out in a few hours.

"There is nothing biological going extraterrestrial because there is no life yet discovered."

It's like saying that something that we haven't discovered yet does not exist.

Who can say something like this? Scientist??? It's completely broken logic.

You frightening me with the flags. Oh, i'm so afraid because of that. You can put that flag directly in your ass.

It's like saying that something that we haven't discovered yet does not exist.

When the evidence are the same as flying pink elephants, yeah, it doesn't exist. Sci-fo films and the human longing that there is something like us out there, don't cut it.

Who can say something like this? Scientist??? It's completely broken logic.

A true scientist would never make a hypothesis based on no evidence.

You frightening me with the flags. Oh, i'm so afraid because of that. You can put that flag directly in your ass.

Have you tried Xanax recently?