Source
As you all know in 1965 Gordon Moore, the then co-founder of Intel, promulgated the law that bears his name according to which the number of transistors in a microchip would double every year, 10 years later in 1975 Moore himself reduced the time a little up to 2 years and so it continues to this day.
Como todos sabéis en 1965 Gordon Moore el por entonces co-fundador de Intel promulgó la ley que lleva su nombre según la cual el número de transistores de un microchip se duplicaría cada año, 10 años después en 1975 el mismo Moore rebajó un poco el tiempo hasta los 2 años y así sigue hasta el día de hoy.
This doubling of the density of transistors every 2 years is achieved by reducing the size of each transistor and this has a limit because from a certain size the laws of quantum mechanics come into play and the results are no longer predictable due to which cannot be reduced further.
Esta duplicación de la densidad de transistores cada 2 años se consigue a base de reducir el tamaño de cada transistor y eso tiene un límite pues a partir de un cierto tamaño entran en juego las leyes de la mecánica cuántica y los resultados dejan de ser predecibles por lo que no se puede seguir reduciéndolos.
Source
The latest Intel chips are already at 10 nm (10 millionths of a mm) and those manufactured with TSMC technology up to 7nm and this is already around the theoretical limit of operation. Currently mounted transistors use FinFET technology or fin field effect transistor, which consists of a fin-shaped channel surrounded on three sides with a gate that controls the flow of electrons.
Los últimos chips de Intel ya están en los 10 nm (10 millonésimas de mm) y los fabricados con tecnología TSMC hasta los 7nm y esto ya está rondando el límite teórico de funcionamiento. Los transistores montados actualmente utilizan tecnología FinFET o transistor efecto de campo de aleta, que constan de un canal con forma de aleta rodeado por tres lados con una puerta que controla el flujo de electrones.
In a press release, IBM announced that it could make chips up to 2 nm, with this, 50 billion transistors could be put into a microchip the size of a fingernail and 75% more efficient or 45% faster than 7 chips. nm using a channel of layers surrounded by gates on all sides, thereby achieving greater control of current flow and preventing leaks.
En un comunicado de prensa IBM anunció que podría fabricar chips de hasta 2 nm, con esto se podrían meter 50.000 millones de transistores en un microchip del tamaño de una uña y un 75% más eficiente o un 45% más rápido que los chips de 7 nm utilizando un canal de capas rodeadas de puertas por todos lados con lo que se consigue un mayor control del flujo de la corriente y evitan fugas.
Source
Since IBM is no longer dedicated to the manufacture of processors, what it has made is a prototype to verify the viability of this technology and when the process is finished it will be put into production through the agreements that IBM has with companies like Intel or Samsung that engaged in the manufacture of microchips.
Puesto que IBM ya no se dedica a la fabricación de procesadores lo que ha realizado es un prototipo para comprobar la viabilidad de esta tecnología y cuando el proceso esté terminado se llevará a producción mediante los acuerdos que IBM tiene con empresas como Intel o Samsung que se dedican a la fabricación de microchips.
More information/Más información
https://singularityhub.com/2021/05/09/ibms-next-generation-chip-tech-shows-off-next-step-in-moores-law/
https://hardzone.es/noticias/procesadores/ibm-primer-chip-2-nm/
Eso sí que es genial IBM lo diseña y si no funciona el culpa de quienes lo fabrican.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Bueno al parecer IBM mantendrá su estatus unos años más.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for sharing this important information.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Today i learned something mew from your post. Thank you so much.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Your every posts are very knowledgeable. Thank you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thankyou very much for share this new update. Lots of things learn form from this technology. Have a nice day.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks to share this amazing technology, technology making our life easy day by day.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah.
I've heard that in chemistry.
But I don't really understand things like that, like quantum and also particles and molecules, that's all I've studied in chemistry.
Thank you for sharing, hopefully many will understand,
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you to share your unique technology.After reading your post we learn many thing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit