Why is life coming from things that are not alive relative to time??? Because it is unobservable, so they tell you millions and billions of years to cover up that fact... Observe entropy, how things decline over time... Also we can observe the moon we can observe Mars, with no life but the life on Earth it cannot be hidden... Go by whats observable, do your own research and challenge EVERYTHING!!!
RE: Tree of Life: Why did evolution bother with multicellular life?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Tree of Life: Why did evolution bother with multicellular life?
Not quite sure how this is relevant? I don't understand the first half of the comment. 'they'?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"they" refers to anyone who uses Billions of years to jump from a theory of how it was to how we observe something is today... As for how it is relevant, I feel that question and statements I posed is at the heart of this article, the assumption of evolution.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is no doubt in the fundamental foundations of reality that evolution is a thing =/
If you don't trust 'them', you are, like anybody else, absolutely free to 'question everything' and do the experiments yourself. But I can speed up the process and tell you you'll end up with the same results
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit