I'd love to see some studies by truly idependent researchers...those who have not been funded by university grants or direct government money. I'd bet the "consensus" would evaporate rapidly under a true market economy analysis such as that. To take the 180 years of climate data we, as humans, have amassed and say that it is somehow representative of the Earth's 4.5 billion years is absurd at best and criminal at worst. Since when can a legitimate scientist say that a 0.000004% sampling means more than nothing?
RE: Global Sea Ice Area - This chart should worry you...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Global Sea Ice Area - This chart should worry you...
Since when does being funded by government grants induce bias? Those are completely without strings. Your talking nonsense about things you clearly don't understand. We have a lot more than 180 years worth of data. Through ice core samples and other techniques we can get a picture of Earth's temperatures over significantly longer periods of time. Your reasoning is completely off base, and illustrates a complete lack of understanding of the topic at hand.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
government grants do not induce bias?...are completely without strings?...HA! You sir are the one who is either completely ignorant or extremely un-informed. There is a huge community of debate around that very issue. Further, like most climate extremists I find it pathetic that the first course you have elected to take is to insult those with differing opinions. If you can't speak to the topic resort to insults...I'm probably a racist too.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't know anything about your opinions on race to pass judgement. With climate change things either are or they are not. The facts show that warming is occuring and that it is exacerbated by human production of green house gasses. Your opinions don't have any bearing on the reality.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep...typical. "the science is settled". No room to discuss. Those who think differently are not to be taken seriously...for I am a scientist and you are not... Your piousness does not help you sell your opion nor make you automatically correct. And by the way, since when does someone with a bio-chem background have more credence than another person with an unrelated science background? Which I happen to have but typically don't feel the need to be holier-than-though about it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit