Astronomers locate a Zombie Star that's come back to life after exploding

in science •  7 years ago 

Scientists have discovered a star that has exploded, survived, and then in zombie nature exploded again more than 50 years later. This has completely puzzled and now challenging what we know about the death of stars.

This example supernova has never been seen before and with over 5,000 supernovas having been discovered so far by scientists.

Going back on data scientists where able to determine the exact location had the matching explosion in 1954. This star has roughly a size of 50 times of our own Sun.

With this finding, massive star evolution and explosions will need to be revised and rethought.

Read more at: http://steemurl.com/jh__0WDI

-- @originate

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

The latest theories on star function and formation lead one to realize that stars are simply expressions of the energy flows that transit the Universe. Some call these Birkeland Currents. These flows are networked and variable. Also, the space around stars can vary radically as a star moves through the Universe. Latest studies have mapped energy flows that originate at both centers of attraction and centers of repulsion.

What this means is the energy and conditions that determine how a star looks and what it produces can and does change during the life of a star. Stars naturally switch on, switch off, eject or let go of massive amounts of matter and energy as the source feed of a star drops down below activation level, and later turning back on when that feed kicks back up is expected in all stars operational life. These systems operate in fractal pattern that have been replicated on other planets, in weather systems, in geological systems, in laboratory constructions, and garage hack experiments.

The observations will continue to accumulate and confuse the old guard which bases their understanding on models that have too many exceptions and patches to remain rational. Simple basic concepts like gravity and conservation of energy have assumptions that simply rely on fantasy or denial to work. Neither of these laws of science are real.

Eventually, if you seek a model to explain what is in plain view, you might want to consider Aether based models. They are simple, mechanical in nature, fractal, and do not rely on fragmenting nature into separate boxes when it is obvious that everything is connected.

What might be more important than some distant zombie star is the history and near future of our own Sun. It is currently moving into a period where the Sun's own magnetic fields are canceling each other out, reducing the effective strength of the Sun's heliosphere and the protection and inspiration for our own geomagnetic sphere of protection from cosmic rays and asteroids as well as the rest of our solar system. Plus, the sun's path through the Galaxy is leading our solar system to a void of magnetic energy which will further deplete the amount of energy (raw Aetheric substance) available to feed our Sun. The significance of these combined changes will be climatic storms on Earth, the likes of which no-one has seen in 10,000 years. There is a huge probability that it will shutter our Sun's output down and initiate yet another 100K year ice age.

It's all connected, and reality bites. "Modern" science is about to have its balls crushed by nature. And man will find how misleading and serious the lack of real science is to life expectancy. We simply have not been developing the man-made systems that can compensate for these natural changes that are obviously cyclic in the natural history of the Earth. Most of the nations, if not all of them, suppress the evidence and technology that would enable survival in an effort to maintain control and preserve the status quo. You have a choice, it won't be easy. Often when you are clueless, it gets harder before you get it.

Amazing thoughts @drb, really great insights shared here.

Hello & Cheers!! I'm a content detection and information bot. You are receiving this reply because a short link or links have been detected in your post/comment. The purpose of this message is to inform your readers and yourself about the use of and dangers of short links.

To the readers of the post: Short links are provided by url shortening services. The short links they provide can be useful in some cases. Generally their use is benign. But as with all useful tools there are dangers. Short links can be used to hide all sorts of things. Quite frequently they are used to hide referral links for instance. While not dangerous this can be deceptive. They can also be used to hide dangerous links such as links to phishing sites, sites loaded with malware, scam sites, etc. You should always be extremely cautious before clicking on one. If you don't know and trust the poster don't click. Even if you do you should still be cautious and wary of any site you are sent to. It's always better to visit the site directly and not through a short link.

To the author of the post: While short links may be useful on some sites they are not needed on steemit. You can use markdown to format your links such as this link to steemit. It's as simple as [steemit](https://steemit.com) Unlike short links this allows the reader to see where they are going by simply hovering over the link before they click on it.

This message was created by a bot. It is part of the ongoing fight against spam and phishing attacks on steemit. If you did not use short links in your post and feel you have received this message in error you can contact @fubar-bdhr on discord or @fubar.bdhr on steemit chat to report the issue.

that is real? @originate

Good post my friend @originate it's really

Good post my friend @originate it's really

nice... post

You have really interesting posts!:-) Thank you very much for the vote that you made in my post:-))))