The purpose of this to show the answer of a scientific creation argument over the evolution vs. creation. The purpose of this article is to explain why, according to the Bible, the development of evolutionary evolution still exists in its present form. Romans 1:25 NIV says, "They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. "Amen".
An important factor in the state of creation versus evolutionary evolution is that most scientists who believe in evolution are atheists or agnostics. There are people who hold the form of theistic evolution. Others get deistic view of God, believing that He exists but is not involved in the world, and everything happens in a continuous, natural course. There are so many and honest views of the data and come to the conclusion that evolution is more appropriate to the data. However, the dominant story in this discussion is that evolution is, somehow, incompatible with the same Bible and faith in God.
It is important to realize that some scientists who possess an evolutionist belief also believe in God and the Bible without seeing one or the other as contradictions. However, most evolutionists say that life has completely changed without any intervention of higher personality. The modern theory of evolution, in practice, is almost entirely a naturalistic science.
There are spiritual drivers behind some of these positions. For atheism is true, there must be an alternative explanation-except a Creator-how the universe and life spread. Although belief in some form of evolution led to Charles Darwin, he was the first developer of a reasonable, natural source for the evolution process: natural selection. Darwin once recognized himself as a Christian, but, as a result of some tragedies that occurred in his life, he later denied the Christian faith and had God.
Darwin's goal is not to refute the existence of God, nor does he see his theory as doing so. Unfortunately, that's how his ideas have been promoted by those seeking to enable atheism. One reason many believers today are fighting the modern evolutionary theory is often wrapped up in a forced, atheistic worldview. Evolutionary scientists are unlikely to conclude that their purpose is to provide an alternative explanation of the origins of life and thus provide the foundation for atheism. However, according to the Bible, this is why the theory of evolution is approaching the way we see it today.
The Bible tells us Psalm 14: 1; 53:1 NIV The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good. . The Bible also states that people have no reason not to believe in a God Creator. " For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse." Romans 1:20 NIV. According to the Bible, anyone who denies the existence of God is a fool. Folly does not imply lack of intelligence. By necessity, scientific evolution is intellectually intelligent. Vanity indicates the inability to properly utilize knowledge. Proverbs 1: 7 NIV tells us, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge,but fools despise wisdom and instruction.
Atheists who support evolution often chew the creation and / or wise designs as non-scientists and are not eligible for scientific analysis. To something to consider as a "science," they refer, it should be "naturalistic." Creation, in meaning, is beyond the rules of the natural world. Because God can not be tested, so the argument goes, creation and / or intelligent design can not be considered science.
Strictly speaking, evolution can not be observed or tested more or less in intelligent designs, but this does not seem to be an issue among unbelieving evolutionists. As a result, all data is transmitted through the understanding, presupposed, and pre-accepted worldview of naturalism, without alternative explanations being considered.
Either the origin of the universe or the source of life can be directly tested or followed. Both creation and evolution require a degree of faith to be accepted. We can not go back in time to observe the origins of the universe or of life in the universe. Those who are adamantly denying the creation do so in places that are logical to force them to deny the evolution as well.
Evolution, especially in relation to the real origins of life, does not fit the meaning of "science" beyond creation. Scientists who promote pure atheistic evolution deny a reasonable theory of origin, often because it does not fit into their unrighteous sense of "science."
If creation is true, then there is a Creator to whom we are responsible. Evolution, as often presented today, is a guardian for atheism. Evolution provides the basis for explaining how life is built apart from a God Creator. Consequently, modern theories of evolution serve as a "creation story" for the religion of godlessness.
The Bible is clear: God is the Creator. Any interpretation of science that attempts to remove God from participation in origin is incompatible with the Scriptures.
creation itself is an evolutive process
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Indeed @elbreeder
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
if one is a bible believeing Christian the whole idea of we evolved from monkeys is dead in the water.
So if we evolved from monkeys, why is there no such creatures left in between the monkey and the human. For a species to truly evolve wouldn't that eliminate the original?? Just my .02.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not true. In fact, modern evolutionary biologists completely reject the idea that "humans evolved from monkeys". Such a statement is a clear misunderstanding of how proper evolution works. The more accepted theory today is that monkeys, apes, and humans all trace back to a common ancestor. How it looks like, they don't know yet. But this theory has been developed thanks to genomics and analysis of thousands of gigabytes worth of genetic data.
"For a species to evolve, it must eliminate the original" is again a wrong notion about evolution. That is absolutely not how a new species forms. The original does not necessarily have to be extinct to give way to the new species. As long as the ecosystems where they live in continue to allow them to survive, both will survive.
P.S. I believe in God myself. But I also studied molecular biology as my major. I just do not believe in these false ideas of science perpetuated in many "Christian" circles. Anyone who holds on to these ideas is either ignorant or misinformed. Thankfully for me, God blessed me with an education and an inquisitive mind, so I now see the truth. Which is why I always like to correct these wrong notions you people have about the proper science of evolution.
P.P.S. The only reason I upvoted your comment is that it sparks a discussion. It made me think and want reply to it. :)))
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit