On Gravity

The universe is the manifestation of infinity from nothing. From our viewpoint, we live within an infinite spectrum of ever larger and ever smaller conglomerations that tend across time to form the most stable shape of spherical as equilibriums. These make the conglomerations then function largely indistinguishable from a single unified system. For instance, the Earth is known as "Earth" rather than an endless list of all its constituent atoms and other building block particles such that it is a particle.

These particles exist in an infinite spectrum of ever larger and smaller systems from our perspective, all of which function the same. The differences arise from the angle of perception. We then label the particles we can observe most directly, and the spectrum goes on so far that we are not presently aware of the existence of an infinite array of particles.

Larger systems are less abundant and more dispersed, while relatively smaller systems are more abundant and common. The array of smaller particles are so subtle and so abundant that they each individually approach nothingness in our perception. However, because of their subtlety their abundance approaches infinite in number in our perception. And, in much the same way as particles can pass unabated through the Earth, because particles are not solid but rather are composed of smaller particles all the way down, there are gaps between the larger constituent particles that make up the larger particles that we observe as, for instance, photons and so they can travel at an approaching infinite velocity. As a result, they are not easily deflected and, unless they are absorbed into another system, they sweep through the universe in all directions and straight paths.

Gravity is caused by ethereal pressure imbalances when objects block a portion of the flow of these particles.

When larger objects exist within these flows of relatively infinitesimal particles, their particles--down through the layers of particles, not necessarily their largest particles (like the atoms of Earth) but rather requiring the particles of which those are composed of to absorb the flows--absorb a portion of the flow of particles. As the flows are so abundant and so subtle, they are only reduced by a degree and the degree to which a system can influence relative particles is dependent on its mass relative to other systems.

The degree of imbalance is therefore a result of how much a first object can block relative to a second object's position that would have otherwise applied a pressure to the second object that determines the force of gravity experienced.

Mass

Objects firstly block flow proportional to their mass. This is intrinsic of a system at any given moment.

Relatively higher mass particles interact with a range of higher mass ethereal particles, absorbing more overall mass from the flow and reducing the overall force of the flow of ethereal particles that influence a second system, thus reducing pressure and leading to a greater overall imbalance and a more measurable gravitational force.

Distance of Separation

The degree of blockage is a function of distance of separation of two objects.

The capacity of a system to block ethereal flows THAT OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE APPLIED A FORCE TO A SECOND SYSTEM is dependent on distance.

At large distances, the percentage of the overall flow able to be blocked is low.

This is because the objects are like points when distance is large and barely block any ethereal flow from all the directions of the cosmos that would have otherwise reached the other object, and so most particles that would have reached the other system absent the other's presence are able to do so, and so the influence is low.

At small distances, the percentage of the overall ethereal flow able to be blocked is high and the effect becomes more measurable, all other variables constant.

As a result, the objects behave less like points and more like material systems that occupy a larger region of the sky and thereby block more flows that would have otherwise reached the other system.

The Gravity of our Position

Our position similarly impacts our environment.

If an object is in a given position, then the position of a second object will determine the direction of the force applied and the resultant direction of motion.

Arrows representing the direction of motion of objects as a result of imbalances in ethereal pressures:

As a result, when we are further down a path, i.e. a line of reasoning, our mental position moves. And as we experience, we grow. And our influence on one another then emerges. We block flows that would have otherwise caused others to maintain their position and thereby produce a motion in the direction of the lives of others. For instance, someone who is in support of a given concept will prevent information from reaching others that would otherwise cause a force in an opposing direction. This causes others to be moved to our position, regardless of who in particular benefits, as a function of mass and distance. For this reason we do not frequently hear opposing viewpoints. Unless it is seen that there are truly no opposing viewpoints able to be held when it comes to the truth. Without all in mind, can all benefit?

Notably, all is the most massive. And if it is additionally proximal it is also the most influential. We can agree to simply live with all in mind. And make the reason to do so demonstrable while protecting others from the lines of reasoning that flow in the opposing direction. All is One.

A government system has a local influence that is confined to apply to especially those within its claimed boundaries. The distance of separation is reduced because the position of the government is that it has dominion over those within its borders.

Additionally, the system is resultant from vast energetic investment by many across a large period of time, frequently beyond the age of any living citizen in the country--meaning, erhm, all were mutually born into it in many instances. And so the system functionally is massive.

Thus, those close enough are drawn in.

A government experiences an equal force, but because we are born into the world--literally citizens from birth, with no capacity to defend ourselves we are absorbed to become building block constituents of the system--it is difficult to be exposed to forces that would otherwise have been felt, thus we do not move the system without being moved ourselves. Escaping it by some "outside force," as per the laws of motion. An object remains in motion or at rest unless acted upon by an outside force. We can move one another. Can we truly move ourselves?

People outside of a given government system experience a more balanced overall influence relative to that system, albeit imbalanced towards closer or more massive alternatives. For instance, no one on Earth experiences a gravitational imbalance due to Saturn, but if we went near it we all would and we would then no longer be materially influenced by the gravitational influence of the Earth. Indeed, in all instances, some force overwhelms all others. It is either All or some finite portion of the unlimited, i.e. Nothing. Sustainability comes from The Source.

Musings

If two objects display an apparent mass relative to one another of, say, their mass divided by the distance of separation, m1/r1 and m2/r2, where r1=r2 in essentially all instances, then the "product of the apparent mass of two objects relative to one another is gravity."

Could there be something to this?

Relating especially to objects at a sufficiently large distance where the approximation of particles as circular holds. At lower distances, a need to account for shape arises, alike to how the angular diameter of a sphere and a circle are approximately identical at large distances but the circle fails to represent the true angular diameter of a sphere at sufficient proximity. Likely, this leads to failures in Newtonian analysis when objects are proximal to one another because in most cases we have been able to model without accounting for shape in gravitational influence. Is it possible to use some sort of multiplication by a relevant aspect of an angular diameter equation that generally is 1 (and thus undetected in most cases) at low angles to correct?

In most instances, approximating the system as a point is immaterial, but when the region of the sky that the object blocks becomes sufficiently large, then the analysis can fail from lack of nuanced details and awareness.

Perhaps gravitational constant G is not so constant and can be arrived at through some angular diameter aspect incorporated into multiplying "apparent mass". Or this is bit is all a bit of nonsensical conjecture. Musings end.