A few days ago, I encountered a Quora answer by Franklin Veaux. The question was “What is the most interesting aphrodisiac you have heard of?”.
Now, I’m personally less than convinced by aphrodisiacs, most are a scam. But Franklin introduced me to something new: PT-141 (or Bremelanotide)
To quote the effects of this complicated looking peptide:
Its effects are interesting. I’ve tried it. It takes a loooong time to work (as a subcutaneous injection, 4–6 hours; as a nasal spray, about an hour), but when it arrives, it arrives like a freight train. There’s nothing subtle about it. (Franklin Veaux)
Other user experiences reach from happy about finally being able to have sex again, after taking dosages of 2.5 to 4 mg (in combination with 25 mg Viagra)1, to someone in his late 50s having not really the best experience upon taking a dosage of 20 mg. 2@suesa
(Maybe it's important to make sure you're taking the correct amount? I don't know. Seems like it.)
But … what’s really behind this drug?
The History
As it’s often the case with new drugs (Viagra was supposed to be used against high blood pressure), the original goal was not to create a powerful aphrodisiac - who would have thought?
Bremelanotide is a derivative of MT-II (Melanotan-I).3 The name might sound familiar, ever heard of melanin? That’s what makes your skin dark(er).
Melanotan-II was created to serve as a tanning agent, which would remove the need for sun exposure. Just that it didn’t work out as intended.
During initial testing of a novel synthetic agent intended for artificial tanning, Melanotan-II, a self-described “human pincushion/ guinea pig” inadvertently self-administered a dose twice the expected concentration. To his surprise, he experienced an 8 hour-long erection, along with some nausea and vomiting. 3
You’re trying to get a nice tan and end up having an 8 hour-long erection. Talk about unexpected side effects. Of course, a discovery like that couldn’t go unexplored, this could be the new Viagra after all!
A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study by Wessells et al. tested 10 men with erectile dysfunction. They received injections of the drug (0.025 - 0.157 mg/kg body weight) and successfully achieved erections. Just as with the “human guinea pig”, side effects like nausea were reported.3.
As previously mentioned, PT-141 is a derivative of MT-II, and in phase 1 trials, it showed similar desired effects with no significant side effects. Phase II trials soon followed, with the main problem being side effects like nausea. 3
What about Women?
Do we really need another drug to give men erections? Isn’t there already enough on the market? What about women, Viagra doesn’t really help here.
Luckily, there’s a study for that!
A placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group, dose-finding trial with 612 premenopausal female participants, to be correct. Palatin Technologies did this study in 2011/2012. Subcutaneous injections proved to have the desired effect of increasing libido, with only side effects like nausea, flushing, and headache. 4, 5
But wait, how did we get from a nasal spray to subcutaneous injections? These are certainly a lot more uncomfortable, why switch?
Because in 2008, there had been concerns that the drug might raise blood pressure, which can be dangerous (especially if you already have elevated blood pressure). They switched to a different method, and in 2014, Palatin conducted a human phase 3 study using only subcutaneous delivery, with no real effect on blood pressure detectable.6. Good news for people with high blood pressure, bad news for those with a fear of needles.
Outlook
As of right now, bremelanotide is not FDA-approved, even though it’s being used in research to treat hypoactive sexual desire disorder7 (what a name …).
In June 2018, the FDA issued an acceptance letter to continue testing the drug for possible future approval. At that point, there had been 30 clinical trials with over 2,500 women. 8
While not intended for human consumption, bremelanotide can be ordered for relatively cheap through peptide-producing companies. 8,9
What do you think? Would you try this peptide as medication, once it’s approved? Would you want to try it before it’s approved? Do you see ethical problems with it? After all, it might be used as a date-rape drug. Then again, the delivery options are not exactly ideal for that to happen …
I’m looking forward to hearing your opinions!
Sources:
2World of Peptides.com - My experience with PT-141 (Bremelanotide)
6New Drug Approvals.org - Female Libido Enhancer - Bremelanotide (2015)
7Bremelanotide Approval Status
Signature by @atopy
I saw your title, Sex Drug PT-141 and thought, "Wow, Suesa's been doing a new story this long and I missed it?" I must say, it's very disappointing that you didn't leave a link to parts 1 through 140.
You're right, administering a date-rape drug via nasal spray would pose a challenge. (Not that I think too much about these things...) Maybe there's a pervert who's preys on people with runny noses?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Haha xD no, the current story is not yet finished. Almost, but not completely.
That'd be a fun story tho, a pharmacist who drugs people through nasal spray...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"By kblaw on pixabay.com "
damn it Suesa I only came here for your nudes...😞
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Clickbait title needs clickbait picture. :P Steem price is too low to post nudes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
you could look at this another way- not enough nudes to rise steem price.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't want to compete with @eveuncovered, tasteful nudes are her niche.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think it would be interesting to see if this drug brought about sexual desire in asexual people who were not accustomed to it, and what sort of internal conflict that could cause or if it would cause any at all. I am not an expert in either asexuality or ethics in science so I am not really sure how controversial or unethical such a study would be.
Note that I am not suggesting asexuality is a "problem" to be "solved;" more of the opposite actually. Could this drug, for example, be sought out by one half of a married couple with incompatible sexual needs, in order to "save" the marriage, at the expense of their partner coming into conflict with an integral part of themself? That definitely sounds wrong to me, if that is the way it would work out.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's actually a very interesting question. And it also brings up a fact I left out in my post: The women included in the trials all had experienced sexual arousal before. So asexual people were not tested.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I’m surprised they would bother with a trial that uses injections. You must really want a boner if you’re willing to stick your self to get one.
Though I suppose if it gives you an erection for 8 hours you’ll have plenty of time to make use of it 😮
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I mean, the large study I referred to was with female participants. There's not really anything a woman can do against hypoarousal, which can severely damage relationships. I can imagine that it might be something a number of women might want to try.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think if I had a girlfriend or wife I would try the medication by mutual agreement, because in relationships, things work with agreements. Everything depends on what my situation is at that moment and the context, if it is already an approved medication, if it is not yet approved.
I never buy things without knowing if I am going to use them or not. This reading is very interesting, I hope the necessary scientific advances arrive soon
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Upvote this comment if you are here after seeing the first picture in this post.
I'm still a virgin and I think for me it is not needed to take drugs as of now. But maybe in future if erectile dysfunction appears, will definitely take some.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Click bait title needs. Click bait picture.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has been voted on by the SteemSTEM curation team and voting trail in collaboration with @utopian-io and @curie.
If you appreciate the work we are doing then consider voting all three projects for witness by selecting stem.witness, utopian-io and curie!
For additional information please join us on the SteemSTEM discord and to get to know the rest of the community!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Stinging nettles (Urtica dioica)
https://herbpathy.com/Uses-and-Benefits-of-Stinging-Nettle-Cid86
Boil it before application (in case it slips your mind in the heat of the moment....)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That looks strange,,why need of drugs for sex?
Do it without drugs.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not everyone is able to achieve sexual arousal without help. There are men that can't get an erection. There are women that don't get wet. It happens and it's normal. Drugs can help with that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great post, kblaw! Franklin Veaux's take on PT-141 is really intriguing. It's wild how a tanning agent turned into an aphrodisiac. The potential for treating hypoactive sexual desire disorder is exciting, despite the side effects they did release PT-141 it's called vyleesi they sell it for a $1000 but you can get it on www.peptidehackers.com for under $100
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit