Will Justice Barrett recognize science instead of religious belief?

in scotus •  4 years ago 

image.png

Watched a few Senators weigh in this morning. None of them will speak or ask the real truth about Amy Coney Barrett:

Medical science has proven that humans are brain dead until their first breath, and not 'viable' until after years of post-natal care. At the moment of birth we emerge from an induced coma, and the senses are a dysfunctional random jumble, unable to cognize any visual, aural or tactile object, nor separate one sensory mode from another.

After WWII, there were hospices for war orphan infants where for budgetary shortfalls, the babies were kept in a featureless room and only fed and changed several times a day, no other attention or interaction from lack of staff. They never developed the ability to focus eyes or ears, or recognize people; their brains did not grow; and most died of microcephaly before 12 months of age. The lack of coherent sensory stimulation inhibited brain growth until the autonomic nervous system could not run their growing bodies.

SO the question is, will Justice Barrett recognize the SCIENCE that proves that full term abortion is a medical decision for the mother, or will she hold to the invalidated religious belief that human life begins with fertilization, like the prior Church championing of a Terracentric Universe?

Further, is she ready to recognize the immorality of bringing forth five children into an over-populated, hyper-consuming society?

I think NOT.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!