Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Don't try to play the victim. Go read this https://steemit.com/haturday/@snowpea/happy-haturday-and-other-random-stuff

For those who want to learn more about @grumpycat's stealing from charity, ask @sircork

P.S. It's sensationalist, not sensionalist. And I wonder why you made this post with only 3 lines? Just so you can use insulting tags? Very original.

I'm asking a very simple question to YOU about the enjoyment part of your claim and you're pointing me to a large text I already read and upvoted.

Also, Was this censorship needed?

Do you really want to drag along @wackou and all the people he delegates to on your righteous crusade to censor a poor cat affected by dwarfism?

Are you for real? YOU dragged him into this with your threats on his delegatees' posts, remember?
And to answer your question, I think you enjoy it, but I can't be sure 100% about your emotions. You tell me. Nevertheless, I don't care if you enjoy it or not, it's the end result that matters.

your a legend @drakos

TL;DR Grumpy downvoted a bid bot who claims to support charity, therefore grumpy likes stealing from charity. Okay.

The claim is accurate. I receive the payments, and I founded the charity. The daily transfers in the wallet are there. And the things alleged in this post are all true.

I don't really want to get into an argument over this, but I don't think flagging people is the same as stealing from them, as there are multiple essential differences. Additionally the one downvoted is not the charity, which makes this an even longer stretch.

Incorrect about who was downvoted. Clearly you are not aware of the 2 months of history with grumpyshat and what he has done here, who he has attacked or what his motives are, but many of us have spoken directly with him on multiple occasions and ARE operating on ALL the facts, understanding ALL his stated intentions and motives and aren't just stepping into a very long conversation and sequence of events with chumpyass. Unlike you, who just showed up in the middle of things without all the information, which is understandable, because you haven't been talking to the asscat for months like us in direct conversations in discord. Have a nice day anyway, but there is no argument here, you just don't really know at all what is going on in this.

I'm operating on the level of information that people provide as arguments. Grumpy asked a question, drakos responded with this post which delivers the main argument that grumpy downvoted that post.

Then drakos also says one should ask you about it, and since you're apparently ALL knowing on this matter, I'm wondering why you don't enlighten us with more facts. I'd check if you have any interesting posts about it on your account, but I can't be bothered to scroll endlessly through 95% re-steems. Mostly blaming Steemit for not providing a hide option for those, but as of now I'd ask you to kindly point toward a good resource representing your perspective and arguments. It doesn't really help if you just tell me "You're wrong, but that's no wonder, you can't know what's going on, like I do" Maybe I was just wrongfully assuming that your side of the conflict is trying to spread awareness and possibly find supporters. I mean you seem to be doing fairly well on your own and probably don't need someone like me with next to no power at all, so I suppose if you want others to keep out of it that would be fair as well.

I've stated it before, but I'm not trying to side with anyone. Last time your side was throwing around insults and swears, this time it's grumpy with the tags. I've seen both. You're right, I don't know all that much of the history between you, but nor do any of the other average Steemit users. Conclusions that are in my opinion misleading like "grumpy downvoted post x, who wanted to share the reward with y, therefore grumpy enjoys stealing money from y" are still easy to point out though. I mean, if someone considers that to be 'stealing' or even 'finding enjoyment in stealing', then so be it, but I don't.

Wishing you a good day as well. Definitely hoping you can eventually resolve this conflict.

Eemm, in the comments of one post, I don't remember the post, explain that you downvote a charity institution. Maybe for that.

There are certain people in this world who steal from charity, but some people do it honestly and they don't have to justify other that they are doing it honestly, let people think what they think, just keep on going.

@drakos answer @grumpycat correctly, this is a serious matter...

Bruh I wasn't going to say shit but you're such a child go suckle on mama's titties

You know one of the sweetest benefits of not using bidbots are?

I don't have to worry about all this drama.

The way I look at it is, once one opens pandora's bidbot box, who knows what will pop out.

It's all perception. Some people look at using bidbots as "stealing" from the rest of the community. While others claim that flagging their posts is "stealing." Some people even say that self upvoting is "stealing."

I say one can do whatever they want with their VP, it's theirs after all. Yeah I wouldn't be happy if someone flagged me, but it wouldn't really be stealing. It's not mine until its in my wallet.