That's nice (I am happy to hear that my articles are of some value for you), but STEEMIT is designed in a way that quality content can (and should) be financially rewarded. If nobody upvotes good articles (and instead of that upvotes himself only or don't vote at all), there is no (financial) incentive to create elaborated articles at all ... If anyway everybody would upvote himself only, it was much easier to write short comments and then upvoting them instead of long articles.
However, for potential investors STEEM (and STEEMIT) is more attractive if they find interesting high quality articles on the platform - and that again is good for the STEEM price again ...
To be able to upvote articles is one of the main differences of STEEMIT compared with other social media platforms.
Agree. It is a natural law; appreciate the work of others, then others will appreciate our work. And the rewards, not necessarily from the people we value. I believe, by doing good, another kindness energy will come together to help me. The important thing, keep the focus of work.
Thank you for your response sir.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit