What some people don't get about sexuality

in sex •  8 years ago  (edited)

My sexuality is pretty damn personal, isn't it? Yours is too, right? I mean, I wouldn't want you to judge me on my sexual preference no more than you would if I did the same to you.

It sometimes shocks me that even now, 2016 years since we started to record years, some places of the world classify anything that slightly strays from the cultural normal sexual preference 'abnormal'.

And we all know what the normal is.

Heterosexual. Or straight, as most people like to call it. I know this because I've never seen a "straight pride march" or a "hetero week" and if you're now starting to think, 

"hey! That's right, why don't we"

Well, it's basically the same as giving toad a lightning bolt or a red shell when you're in first place on Mario Kart. Why would he need it if he's in first place?

Why would you give privileged people more privilege?

Let's talk about that for a second. If you're straight there's no ifs, or buts about it. Your up there with the privileged kids.

Have you ever had someone walk up to you and told you to stop holding hands, kissing or fondling your partner because it disgusts them? It's never happened to me, never. Back in my younger years I was kissing a young lady in my crowd of friends which was met with chants of,

"on ye go, son!" 

"Get inn there!"

Imagine the difference if that were a man I was kissing, and then think back to what I said about privileged sexuality.

And I often see the protests on TV and the banners about homosexuality, or whatever sexuality, how that they are an abomination and should be stopped before they turn our kids gay.

I wonder if anyone stopped to think how they treated gay kids in school, the comments, the bending over and jeering,

"Come on then!"

The laughing, the bullying. To name just but a small few.

Do you think that really, anyone would actually choose to be anything other than straight in today's climate?

Don't get me wrong. To me there's nothing wrong with any sexual denomination, but to actually choose to fight the uphill fight from a very young age?

I'm not too sure.

I think we're born what we are

And I think people should be left to be what they are. (unless it's sexually breaking the law - just to clarify)

It doesn't impact us, so why worry? And if it does impact us then we should worry. But until then, I'm not.

And I always wonder if it's not really about religion, or us, or whatever statistic. I wonder if it's more about population and birth to death ratio.

I read an article once that said to maintain a balanced and increasing economy a country needs [x] births to [x] deaths. And I wonder if it's more-so about that.

The more people we have owning their selves the less control the financial elite have over us.

But that's just a shot in the dark.

Thanks for listening! :)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Just no kids or animals! =P

Yes an arbitrary old-enough age for consent. And animals can't consent so it's covered lol

People are strange when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone
Women seem wicked when you're unwanted
Streets are uneven when you're down

It's normal because only a man mating with a woman produces children.

All sex for mere pleasure is ultimately abnormal and socially contemptible in healthy societies, contraceptives are a perversion of what you're meant to be doing and the woman's happy conception is always desirable. I am a great pervert myself, so I know exactly what I am talking about.

The modern libertarded point of view is a well-known luciferian false path. It is deliberately backwards: you are forced to place carnal pleasure and "freedom" ahead of everything else in your reasonings. Pleasure elevated as the First Principle of everything is of course a delusional and maladaptive form of hedonism. Think about it. Why is sexual activity pleasurable in the first place? Because that's nature's way to encourage & facilitate reproduction. The sexes are otherwise disgusted by each other. We are not children, we have some understanding of ourselves beyond mere pleasure of the moment; the luciferian world order subverts this and requires everyone to think and act like irresponsible, pointlessly rebellious children.

Even masturbation is socially contemptible where indigenous reason (and not pre-packaged luciferian rebellion) still rules in men's hearts. Even animals can be observed hiding away to engage in it. When we say that homosexuality is abnormal, that is what we mean: it is all a type of masturbation, a type of perversion of the natural order that physiologically cannot lead to anything good. Normal heterosexual sex leads to the continuation and expansion of the species, therefore representing the ultimate good by definition.

Homosexuality is to sex what junk food is to nutrition.

And that's why "in 2016" everyone on television suddenly feels very tolerant and let's all hold hands and accept all kinds - because it's a way to curb reproduction. Especially among the so called "privileged" element: the undesirable & problematic whites.

so happy that someone is truly aware about this issue. Homosexuality has always been around but in extremely low percentage because it was socially abnormal. The zionists/ luceferians/ secret societies saw an opportunity to degrade society they pushed and propagandized this issue and conditioned people to CHOOSE this way of expressing sexuality. Mind you the social pressure and the encouragement to choose homosexuality are ever so present. Particularly with the stuff they are teaching kids in school now. Now a days it's almost uncool to be hetero, they are making it so appealing to be different and to be hateful towards heterosexual people. So sad that heteros will be the minority in the near future.

AND NO THERE IS NO GAY GENE, proving that homosexuality is part of social conditioning.

http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/10/no-scientists-have-not-found-the-gay-gene/410059/

PLaw Makers in Canada just decriminalized bestiality. Eventually they will decriminalize pedophilia. they are already priming society for it with this kind of predictive programming:

https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2013/12/22/is_pedophilia_a_sexual_orientation.html

http://www.camh.ca/en/hospital/about_camh/newsroom/news_releases_media_advisories_and_backgrounders/archives/2008/Pages/irish_media_story_jan08.aspx

We got all that tolerance and "freedom" because of "The Overton window" which is social technology.

I disagree. Sex is MUCH more than reproducing.

It is the meeting and coition of two sexual energies. So if a man happens to be more feminine than masculine, or is only attrcated to men, who gives a fuck? Id rather everybody be hpy in any way they can because vibrations radiate.

Cogliostro,you can have your bigot views,there is freedom of speech. But they have no basis in rationality or science,and please don´t bother gay people with them. Sex is not about reproduction. Reproduction is a biological function. Sex is an act,and I don´t care why I have a sex drive. You can make the argument that we have the sex drive for the evolutionary purpose of reproduction,but to go from there and claim that sex SHOULD be about reproduction,is just a random dogma.
I have a child,and I am not planning to have more. I still enjoy sex. Mostly with women,but I´ve had experiences with men as well, and it´s all great!
Sex is pleasure,but can also be a deep connection, something spiritual even.
Your views are obviously based on religion. Religion is just stories for children.

Kooshikoo, as you have aptly demonstrated, you have no higher principle than the pleasure-of-the-moment principle. Unfortunately this is the case. A true observation from my original post that we cannot hand-wave away. You are a good little luciferian enabler, and would be applauded any day on television.

But 98% of the rest of humankind do not share the degenerate western views. Unlike you and I, they are not living in Sodom & Gomorrah yet. They rightly see you and I as abominable.

I did not claim that sex SHOULD be for reproduction - I pointed out that it already IS for reproduction.

And you, the lil luciferian rebel, "don't care". You want your "freedom" to ignore reality. OK! You're allowed to ignore reality if you want to; but remember that you will not be able to avoid the consequences of ignoring reality. Your lands are being depopulated, and your main concern is "how can I be more libertarded than the next guy and show my support for the less-than-1% of freaks out there, as if they were the normal ones and straight man-woman pairings were oppressive, backwards, and outdated". Naturally this is a position of deep-rooted sexual helplessness and maliciously inverted values, which probably infected you through the education system & TV. To your great credit, you certainly did not come up with what you believe by yourself.

So I would put it to you that someone like you, for now a docile prisoner of the unexamined life and unexamined belief system, has no business telling a man like myself anything about rationality. Rationality, especially the kind that goes against the grain of the "zeitgeist" is only for the strong and for the truly free.

Religion is just stories for children.

Oh, but science is also not on your side...

once again you hit the nail on the head love how clean your feed is and how polished your posts are.. keep it up.

Sex is only meant to be for reproducing, we as humans like everything take it personal and convert it to something more. It is now not just for reproducing but for pleasure as well on species on this planet that have sex for pleasure. Take it as you will but, sex is merely chemical reactions to one another much like "love"

I can't find a good lgbt community on here! Any suggestions!?

Create one

There really isnt a good way to create a "group" on steemit atm besides #Queer or #LGBTQ ..What do you think?

I will join you,madhatting!

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

U HAVE BEEN BANNED BY THE SPOOKY BOOTY BANGER
▒▒░░░ ░░░░░░░▄▐░░░░▒▒▒░░░
▒░░░░░░▄▄▄░░▄██▄░░░
░░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░
░░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄
░░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
░░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░
░░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░░░░░
░░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░░░░
░▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀░░░░░
░▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀░░░░░
░░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄░░░░░
░not░░░░▀███▀█░▄░░░
░broken░░▐▌▀▄▀▄▀▐▄░░░
░FEELS░░▐▀░▐░▌░░▐▌░░
░░good░░░█░░▐░▌░░░█░░
░░MAN░░▐▌░░░▀░░░░░█░RAPE THIS POST 6 TIMES
WITHOUT GETTING BANNED BY NAZI MODS OR
GET DIAGNOSED AS a noob!!!

░░░░░░░░░░ ░▄▀▀▌░░░░
░░░░░░░▄▀█░░█▄▀░░░░░
░░░▄▄▀▐▌░▐▌░█░░░▄▄▀▀▌
░▀▀█░░█▄▄▀░░▄▄▀▀▌▄█▌▌
░░░█░░░░░▄▀▀▄▄▐▒▌███▐
░░░▀░░░▐▀▄█▀▀▒▒▒▌███▐
░░▄▀▀▌░▐▐██▌▒▄▐▒▌███▐▀▐
▐▀▄█▌▌░▐▐█████▐▒▌███▄█▐
▐▐██▌▌░▐▐███▀▒▒▒▌████▀▐
▐▐██▌▌░▐▐███▒▄▐▒▌█▀▄▄▀▀
▐▐██▌▌▀▐▐█████▐▒▄▄▀░
▐▐██▌▄█▐▐█▀▀▄▄▀▀░░░░
▐▐████▀▐▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░
▐▐█▀▀▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░
▐▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
NEED MORE GAY
HETERO IS FOR PUSSIES
FUCKING PUSSIES

LOL!
Pussies are for half of the heteros rather.
I´m bi, so just a semi-pussy?

You asking me if you're a pussy?Good for you, mister.

"I am All..." ;)

Haha. I'm Hetero. I have experimented though, tried a bit of this.. and that, with men and women - and it's safe to say I'm hetero :)

Have you seen the movie Zoolander 2?

There is a character in that film that claims they are not shackled by societies limitations... they are all... both male and female and everthing inbetween...

Interesting! I have seen zoolander - but the sequel is on my must watch list :)

It was surprisingly funny for a sequel!

I'm digging your posts and would love to do a "20 questions" feature interview with you! (Check my blog for examples)

Interested? Let me know your email on here or Steemit chat and we can discuss!

Why not 21? Lol

There is no such thing as homophobia. Everyone that says to have a problem with gays always has one of three issues all unrelated to homosexuality:

  1. They know no purpose other than the purpose given to them. They think their purpose is in reproducing only.
  2. They have homosexual desires and don't like it because of how they notice society treats those people differently, they don't want to suffer.
  3. They were mistreated by a gay person at some point and project that pain to all gays.

The reason why people are made to believe their purpose is in reproducing is because of the crazy idea that we do whatever the majority says. All groups want to be a majority and some groups actually encourage their people to reproduce to retain what they think of as power.

People aren't just going to stop having babies, this is an irrational fear that is being artificially fueled by ideologies that can't survive without corrupting young minds.

I've written a bit about how this idea of democracy is hurting us and some ways the blockchain could help: https://steemit.com/religion/@tommycordero/why-the-transsexual-in-me-is-attracted-to-blockchain-tech

I am sure it is very shocking to hear homophobia doesn't exist, what you are experiencing is closer to transphobia. But in reality is just fear of not being of use, not having purpose. It as nothing to do with who you like but rather whether the combination will produce minds that are easy to claim. I call it identity colonialism.

If we understand what is causing maybe we can change it. No one dislikes or fears gays just because they are gay.

Being non-heterosexual is just plain harder than being heterosexual. Besides the fact that a lot of people will look down upon you for your non-standard relationships and sexual practices, you're pulling from a much smaller dating pool. It's just harder.

So much so, that you almost have to believe that people are born as or unable to help or control their non-heterosexual orientation. Because nobody would choose that kind of difficulty in life, just for fun.

However, if we go down that road, believing that a non-standard sexual orientation -- meaning someone can't reproduce in the conventional way -- is an inborn, immutable trait, then we're also buying into the idea that non-heterosexuality is essentially a handicap. Their sexuality is in a wheelchair. Other people can reproduce and get turned on by sexual acts that cause reproduction. They can't. They're handicapped.

Essentially, this post is saying that picking on non-heterosexuals is like beating up the kid in the wheelchair, so don't do it.

io non sono gay

nemmeno io.

Biologically heteros riproduce, homos don't. It clear that in the society there a far more heteros than homos. If homos could reproduce, they would probably be 50% of the population and therefore normal.

Who is to say that we need to increase our population? Even if we aquire (usurp) another planet I do not think there is a literal NEED for reproduction. However, there are many elitists who claim that the population needs tl be reduced because we are all useless eaters....now, I dont agree with this, but at least they make a case: whats yours? @pompe72

Ok then, but if you have a population 100% homo, then it will go extinct, not being able to reproduce (at least in a natural way).

Of course. It is not something to be encouraged in my opinion, but I dont think the idea should be bashed. If a population turned 100 % homo (which is impossible because no authority can control the desires of so many different types of people into one category) we could still clone human babies by duplicating embryos.

But if you go that route, the laws of naturale selection would go to hell. Plus you would have a more complex system for creating humans, and the more complex a system is the more fragile it is.
This blog reminds me of the film Gattica.

@pompe72 what is gattica?

Sorry typo, the film is Gattaca. In the future, parents select their best genomes to reproduce their kids and the naturally (casualy) born are looked down on. This brings discrimination between the more advanced selected people and the average unselected Joes.

Explain how this makes sense to someone who is activley progressive in removing the word "normal" from his vocabulary? Nothing is normal in this universe. The idea of normal is a scam to get you to act like everyone else, just like mental dis-ease. A label.

Normal is like the center of a circle, all the points form the circle, but there is no point in the center of the circle.

I dont believe in normal. The law of least resistance is what govwrns behavior. Away from pain and towards pleasure, or going in the direction with tje least hurdles but that will take you to the same end point. If there is a normal, then it is the laws of the universe. (One being the fact we exist) but also who is to say that if other universes and /or omniverses exist, they do not go by different rules and therefore would have a toltaly different definition of normal? What you describe with the circle is laws of geometry, who is to say those laws are not different in anpther universe?

Normal: the average or mean. Depends on your definition of normal.

Your sexuality being personal is probably a forgotten concept here in the Netherlands. But not in a bad way.

America can take some note's from us...

If you just sex to copulate then the whole "sexuality" is a right you do not deserve...

The problem with sex is the same with all other pleasures, it has the potential to become an addiction

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

The sexuality battle has already been fought and won. Who would judge someone else on the base of sexuality in 2016?

nice post. interesting. i enjoy it. upvoted

Every time a well developed country starts to decay, there's a rise in "the abnormal".
I don't agree your sexuality is something very personal. Why make a big deal out it? If you are bi, gay or straight then OWN IT!
But having just said that, I do think being anything other than straight is abnormal. I don't treat people differently because of that, but I find it odd that they don't want to acknowledge it as something abnormal. It's pure logic.

the day humanity stops fighting here and realizes the there is other worlds for us to inhabit and visit is the day birth rates and death rates are not overly important. Also gay people are fabulous.

In my country we have LGBT legal marriage since 2010 and our new commercial and cil code of law regultes equally (with the obvious differences) as heterosexual marriage. We have one of the most advantage countries in Latin America about LGBT rights. Another is the change of sex in the ID (D.N.I) in our country. No problem for me and most of people here with same sex love. It´s a choice and feelings of adult and free people, equal to heterosexual citizens. Kinds regards from Argentina.

hear hear! J.

Hi, off topic question: who is @lakers ?

I completely agree that we are all the same and what we do in our bedroom is our business and doesn't make us less or more of a person.
But yet I think some people are bothered by "gayness" because as someone said here so much of it's been rubbed into our face these days. It is exactly the "what we do in the bedroom" part. If we are all the same why do you Pride yourself on what you do in the bedroom? Do you know there are people who like to be shit on and pissed on too? Great! Who gives a crap ? Good for you! But should they have parade too? Almost like "we are better and unique because we like to do these things" .
I don't mind. I really don't. But if I meet you I want to know who you are first not what you do in your bedroom. And let me look up to you because who you are not because you fking another guy. It isn't a shame,but there is nothing to be proud about it either.