Female Privilege and Sexism

in sex •  8 years ago 

Recently, it has been argued with me that female’s have certain privileges (advantages not available to males). While it depends on how you define privilege, it is true that women have different privileges than men do.

More specifically, though, I will be discussing how these assumptions are benevolent, and how it affects us on a societal level (yes, it is harmful to men, too).


Female Privilege

“This is not female privilege. This is survival of the prettiest.” - Blythe Baird

Some say that women can “exploit” themselves sexually easier than men can, and because of this, they are more likely to abuse that privilege.

Like I said before, sex can either be empowering or objectifying, depending on the subject. See here.

Selling sex appeal is indeed a guilty culprit of objectification and dehumanization, but it’s not always repressing (sexually, socially or economically).

Even unknowingly, thinking that empowerment is “female privilege” can be problematic.

One of my many reasons behind that logic is this:

Not all women (people) want to be empowered sexually, so the ideal that it is “woman’s birthright” to hold sexual power is a sexist stereotype.

Can it really be argued that by sexualizing a woman it gives her privilege? Well, not really. We didn’t necessarily sign up for that. The problem is that ideals like this are socially constructed. Once we recognize that, we come to face a bigger issue.

When people are diluted down to X and Y, we create stereotypes that are harmful to everyone. Including men. Example:

“Masculinity is defined as sexual dominance, femininity as sexual submissiveness: genders are “created through the eroticization of dominance and submission. The man/woman difference and the dominance/submission dynamic define each other. This is the social meaning of sex.” -MacKinnon

Would you want to be part of a system that sets standards that are impossible for most people to achieve?

I know I don’t. We should be whoever we want, without having to define it.


Thinly Veiled Sexism

"Misogyny" often surfaces in political struggles over women's role, and you can tell because the control of women becomes personalized, intrusive and often sexualized. -Naomi Wolf

“I’ve seen the argument floated around that if there’s such thing as “male privilege” that there must therefore be an equivalent of “female privilege”. While I can understand why someone could come to this conclusion if their main reference for “privilege” was one of the privilege checklists, this is actually a misunderstanding of male privilege, which is an institutional — not a personal — privilege.”

From Feminism 101

With this in mind, everything is telling me that “female privilege” is actually sexism. When we examine this more closely we can see that it further reinforces ideas that socially keep us separated.

It’s not that women have power over men. What some see as power is actually a system of standards that is harmful to everyone (i.e. traits that are inherently male or female). While it may seem like privilege at first glance, these are root examples of inequality.

“Men need to get it through their heads that they, too, are under the heel of power structures that have no interest in promoting their welfare. They must understand that the rights and privileges that they have hitherto been enjoying fall far short of the privileges they could enjoy were they to try and achieve them. The internecine warfare that occurs between women and men, people of color and white people, straights and gays, as they all squabble like schoolchildren in an attempt to gain or deny rights, is exactly what those in power want. They promote it, they foment it, they do everything they can to aggravate it, because they know that if we were all ever to get our fucking shit together, and demand that the society we all live in and contribute to should be fair and decent to everyone, then the egregious wealth and power that they enjoy would finally meet its end.”

From Feminism is Humanism

In conclusion, it is in my opinion that “female privilege” does not parallel nor fit into the dynamic of “male privilege.” I feel as though it denies the underlying issue of institutionalized sexism.

What do you think? Comment below.


I hope one day we can see past our differences and will value each other for our uniqueness of our minds and experiences.

Thanks for reading, xoxo Vera.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

When feminists bring up "male privilege", it has often caused me to think of the many ways that females are privileged. These things are often not complained about by men, and there is no political ideology for men that capitalises on their sense of victimhood, as there is for women.
Female privileges:

  • Lower sentencing for the same crime
  • Drastically better outcomes in family courts than men
  • Not drafted to war
  • Negative statements about individual women or women in general are 'misogyny'. Negative statements about individual men or men in general are socially acceptable and even celebrated.
  • Women benefit from the status of being automatically seen as the underdog and the victim. They therefore get preferential treatment, affirmative action, and the benefit of the doubt.

But most of all, females have MASSIVE privilege in terms of sex. This is where feminists want to have their cake, and eat it too. They want to vilify men and masculinity for certain things, without wanting to give up the power that is the root cause of those things. Not that they could give it up anyway, as this state of affairs is biologically hard-wired, and not merely a social construct.

You know the 'key and lock' analogy? "A key that can open any lock is a great key (stud), but a lock that can be opened by every key is a terrible lock (slut)."
As comedian Jim Jefferies puts it: "When you have a baby boy, as a father you think 'I hope he bangs all of the girls in the neighbourhood when he grows up. But when you have a baby girl, you don't think 'I hope she bangs all of the boys'. In order to sleep with a lot of girls, a guy needs to be some combination of good looking, funny, and wealthy. In order for a girl to sleep with a lot of guys, she just needs to be there."
Now, this might seem like a sexist double-standard. But it underlies a deeper truth about reality: women are more valuable than men. They can give birth and create life. Men are disposable, and have always been treated as disposable throughout history. Men hold women up on a pedestal; part of the dynamic of men being the hunter and women being the hunted, is that in being the hunted they are also the prize. Women use and abuse this sexual leverage every day without even realising it. Yet, they can't really be blamed for it, because that's just the way that nature is. If you don't think that women have power over men, that just reflects the fact that you are blind to your own privilege. Even if society could drop these 'standards', which you say are so harmful, women wouldn't want to, because they benefit far too much from the fact that men essentially worship them.
Your article, and feminism in general, tries to deny reality by incorrectly claiming that gender is a social construct and has no inherent foundation to it. More than that, feminism is downright hostile to masculinity (and also femininity), to the point of wanting to erase them entirely, and wanting to live in an androgynous dystopia.

I would also challenge you to show me where exactly institutional male privilege exists, given that the wage gap myth has been debunked about a million times, and no serious economist accepts it.

These are the proofs vera uses to back her claims

"To argue for men’s inclusion into women’s political and structural spaces is not only fundamentally heterosexist; it also serves an old nationalistic claim that women need to take care of men, no matter where they are located and or what they are engaged with." -Patricia McFadden

That is what she provides as evidence. Can you believe that!

I don't see you providing better information. So, yeah, I'm gonna stick with that.

Loading...

Feminism is Humanism. awwww. That wetness on my eyes was just from feeling very deeply moved from your article.

lol I hope that is genuine!

Very well written, insightful post @veralynn ... Please keep up the good work !

Your posts are excellent and very informative. Look forward to your future posts.

Thank you @naifaz ! I'd like to add, I am not correct all of the time. If you have any opinions or questions, please share them. I am always eager to have a discussion about these issues.

Well then... I feel that the privilege you speak of is not necessarily what a woman has but it was a man gives to a female. Further more I don't think privilege is the right word. Women do not use their bodies as a privilege more over they just want to feel pretty. This is where the objectification comes into play by the men. Where the "privilege" could be exploited is by women trying to take advantage of the very man who empowered her to do so. Men simply want to have sex with these women. I'm not saying that a man has any power over a woman; just what he thinks he can do for her or give her to help his chances of having sex.

Like I said earlier women just want to feel pretty not be treated like objects. If men were to treat women like people instead of property we would advance as a society very quickly.

While I think it's a broad assertion to say women just want to feel pretty, I do agree that women do not want to be objectified. Thinking women have privileges (sexually or otherwise) helps uphold the underlying issue, which is actually male privilege.

A+. Keep up the good work.

Keep on postin! don't let the haters slow you down :)

I'm in this for the long run. Not getting rid of me any time soon!

omg just used this same image for a blog. LOL I didnt remember you using it. >_<

We feminists love to shout from the rooftop about male privilege. Some people have started to notice that there is a lot of female privilege going on as well. This is problematic.

Please stop and shut up. There is only male privilege, because it's institutional. Whatever that means. Anyway, I don't agree that female privilege is problematic, but male privilege definitely is.

I am against sexism, inequality, and abuse. Let's all see past our differences, and keep attacking male privilege together. It doesn't matter if it's well deserved or practical; it is something predetermined, like gender, so it's a social construct, so we reject it because freedom is better. We only want to live in a world where nothing is determined, and we define ourselves however we want to from moment to moment. That is freedom, and it is not insane. Thank you.

You are being ironic, right?

It is ok to want to define yourself, I don't object that

The probem is you want to define everybody else. It is called fascism.

Vera is too stupid to see it, or maybe it is the only way she can get approval, setting into that stereotype, in which case, she defines herself in the way that gives her the greatest possible reward given the current circumstances

lol wow, you clearly have misinterpreted my opinions.

much wow

Thank you!

Would the discrepancies in the sentencing/how society views female sex crimes be an example of female privilege? It seems much more socially acceptable for an older woman to be with a teenage boy than the other way around. There does seem to be a double standard in at least how people view those sorts of crimes.

I don't think so. If anything, it's a manifestation of male privilege.

How would it be male privilege if males face harsher sentences for the same crimes?

Don't argue with a dolphin

Yes! It certainly is a double edged sword.

I would agree that females have differing privileges from males.

However, I don't think that in the scenario you are describing this fits the "female privilege" rhetoric. From what I have seen, the younger male in the situation is applauded for his "sexual conquest," and we encourage this type of behavior when we oversexualize women. That does not make the male any less of a victim, though.

Like I was pointing out earlier, institutionalized sexism affects all of us.

I think better examples of female privilege would be social advantages we have created. Such as, assuming men will make the money, women are weaker than men (therefore don't have to "work as hard"), chivalry, etc.

I wasn't necessarily looking at it from the victims point of view, more so the judicial aspect I guess. When I see that the punishment for the same crime can differ whether you are a minority vs a white man, that is often described as white privilege. Shouldn't it also be female privilege if they are sentenced less often/to less time for the same crimes that men commit? You definitely seem more knowledgeable than I am on the topic so I am honestly asking, I do enjoy the discussion.

I would call that gender disparity.

I'm sure some would say that is a prime example of privilege, but what it makes me question, why are we receiving different treatment to begin with? It implies that women are less accountable (which is a sexist assumption in itself).

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

While its difficult to stereotype - as there are always exceptions - and this is an interesting angle, I think it's far more interesting to focus on the archetypes that underly male and female, and where we are in history, before you can get to the core about "privilege".

See if you can agree with this - and if you can spot a pattern in the "Ying and Yang":

Male

cpu / polling / serial / efficiency / bigger is better / calling / giving / pursuer / hunter / prefer few big decisions / centralization / micromanagement / fear

Female

gpu / interrupts / parallel / multitasking / more is better / waiting / receiving / gatekeeper / gatherer / good at lots of little decisions / decentralization / delegation / trust

Conversely though, they reflect on each other - each transaction or action has two ends and they are complimentary.

Male

lots of sperm / polygamy

Female

limited eggs / monogamy

I'm not judging or saying "this is how it is." It's just an interesting lens to apply, that could help you think about things differently and reach insights that you might not reach otherwise.

Men thrive in a world of scarcity, from that whence we came. Women thrive in a world of abundance, like the one we are now entering. We are moving from a man's world to a woman's world.

That's an interesting idea. I don't like to stereotype or attribute genders to traits, though. I find it restrictive.

Very here is an exercise

How does the invention of airplanes connect with male privilege

I don't think it does.

I do not 100% agree with you. Now women have indeed more power.

At the beginning of the XX our society changed. The people started to move from the countryside to the cities, men moved from farms to factories. The fathers couldn't stay close to the sons like before.
We (guys) have been raised by women, at home, at school, without a male figure, therefore the women taught the guys to be nice with women, to please them, to serve them and so on, giving the women a lot of power, belittling the male figure. They want the same rights, but not the same duties.

I think winning the girls is the men's nature, like pleasing the man is the woman's nature; but most women won't admit it. Guess why? It's not convenient!
I will discuss about it in my Steemit soon!

  • The Rope