Sexual Liberation and the Relationship Evolution

in sexual-freedom •  8 years ago 

Sexual Liberation and the Relationship Evolution is the subtitle of my, soon to be published, book "The Smile on My Face". My intention is to create this blog in order to crowd-fund its publishing, and distribution of the information to people with questions. The book is told in personal true-story form, answering questions from my 30+ years of experience in open relationships. In this blog I want to share my experience, and my registered nursing knowledge while passing on new things I discover.
Today, for example, I read this exciting article about human reproductive organs. This new 3d model of the female clitoris will be used in French schools to teach a more accurate description of human anatomy (and hopefully physiology)!

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/aug/15/french-schools-3d-model-clitoris-sex-education

 Understanding more about female orgasm is vital for continuing our evolution as we follow the women's liberation movement into the next level of sexual freedom. This improved awareness will assist in the relationship evolution as we all become more familiar with how our bodies work. Human sexuality is an exhilarating component of human relationships, and I celebrate this gigantic step toward releasing shame and ignorance on the topic!
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Looking forward to reading more of this !! :)

boooooo
Are you @msgvings?
I guess your throwing evolution out the door with this theory?

Huh? He (she?) doesn't explain anything about what the theory is in this post but you think he's throwing out evolution?

I think one must throw out evolution to push narratives like this. we evolved out of polyamory into monogamy because of "R" and "K" selection.

Trying to push the idea of "R" selection is only pushing the idea that evolution should not matter so we can regress backwards.

The moment you bring evolution into it the idea of an open relationship is smashed it to shit. This is pushing an idea that we should move backwards on the evolutionary scale.

So I do not need to hear the full theory when the basis of it is completely flawed.

its fine you obiously are going to keep pushing your narrative no matter how much proof I supply

You have literally provided no proof. All you've done is claim polyamory is r selected behavior and defined r selected behavior, without giving any reason whatsoever as to why polyamory is r selected.

at worst you will waste a little it reading something and them moving on laughing at my silliness right?

More likely I'll get caught up arguing with you about it... ;)

also none of your picts load

What pics? I haven't posted any in this thread...

weird this pops up I just thought it was a pict.

That is a pic, but I'm not op. :p

Also it does load for me so might be a problem on your end...

op?
It loads for you but that does not mean it loads for everyone else. I have ran into this before. Your image is not viewable by all internet browsers. Just trying to help so everyone can see the picts. :/

Ahh... Nope. Not even a little. If anything there's a lot of support for polyamory if you look at evolution.

lol
R and K selection.

Polyamory is R selective actions. it is for dumb stupid animals that can't do anything but reproduce because they don't have a long life and is a very slow evolution.

Monogamy is K selective behavior, leads to longer life, less kids but smarter because more time invested in them and evolution like the speed we have had in a monogamous society.

Here are some links about R vs K
http://jaredreser.com/Background/Biology/randkstrategies.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

Stupid comment limit...

You're making big assumptions about how polyamory works. There's no reason parental involvement needs to be affected, and in fact you often see the most kids among religious monogamous couples.

lmfao!
You must not understand evolution.
Thank you for the push to write a post about R vs K
:D

Given that your own sources say k/r is defunct... Go ahead amd write that post.

lost importance in the early 1990s, when it was criticized by several empirical studies.[4][5] A life-history paradigm has replaced the r/K selection paradigm

Won't change the fact that you're making giant, incorrect assumptions in order to fit your beliefs.

Polyamory doesn't mean more kids and less attention. It means alternative arrangements for relationships. A "monogamous" father might have a mistress while a polyamorous father would simply be honest about having a second girlfriend. Literally no difference between the two as to how kids are raised.

I did make the post, check it out if you want and feel free to correct anything im wrong about in it. it is always good to learn how I was wrong about something.
cheers!

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

lol, lost importance is not the same as defunct. -smh-

also you chopped up that quote. it says it has been criticized. if you understood what it was you would understand why it is criticized and is actually banned from ted talks, yahoo and google. because if you use the r vs k structure with race it becomes very "raciest". also the link you took that quote from is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a quick refrence, the basis to start your research not the end of the line for most, considering it changes weekly by people that don't always know what they are talking about. here is the full quote not distorted like you did to it,

The theory was popular in the 1970s and 1980s, when it was used as a heuristic device, but lost importance in the early 1990s, when it was criticized by several empirical studies. A life-history paradigm has replaced the r/K selection paradigm but continues to incorporate many of its important themes.

so if you look at a life history paradigm it is almost the exact same, in fact it is basdes of rvsk. only has reproducitive risks and reproductive timing added to it basically. it is all based off r vs k

its fine you obiously are going to keep pushing your narrative no matter how much proof I supply and im going to continue to write this post no matter how much you push r selective ideas.

maby check out my post on it. prolly wont be dne till tomorrow im hella tired and already after 2am. at worst you will waste a little it reading something and them moving on laughing at my silliness right?

have a good night and hopefully talk to you soon. also sorry I often come off as an asshole.

also none of your picts load

op?

Original Poster. That is I did not write the first post, therefore it is not my image... and it works for me...

ahh i see

Congratulations @magneticspirit! You have received a personal award!

Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.

For more information about this award, click here

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

Congratulations @magneticspirit! You have received a personal award!

2 Years on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @magneticspirit! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!