That paper is BS none of that is current - none of that can work - all of it was fixed ages ago. FUD
RE: TheShadowBrokers Monthly Dump Service - June 2017 Update
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
TheShadowBrokers Monthly Dump Service - June 2017 Update
I acknowledge this in the comment with an edit. To be fair, the Monero team only (as far as I could see) published an unofficial rebuttal as opposed to an official one with a request for correction. Surprised that the authors of the paper haven't issued a retraction/update of some form to explain its been fixed anywhere easily findable...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
(I'm not one of the authors of that paper.)
As far as I know there's nothing incorrect in the paper that needs to be retracted.
You can see one of the authors of the paper — Andrew Miller — being interviewed by a journalist about it here: https://cointelegraph.com/news/monero-transactions-history-can-be-revealed-and-exposed-research The journalist specifically asks "Say I downloaded a Monero wallet right now and got some and tried to send them for a transaction. How linkable would a transaction be today?".
Since some people posted speculations about my company's involvement in the research and our motivations, our company posted this statement: https://forum.z.cash/t/on-improving-user-understanding-progressing-tech-with-science/15387
By the way, check out the awesome block explorer that the paper came with: https://monerolink.com
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit