You have spoken well and i can't agree with you more @flauwy, well first Markus you were paid for the services you offered to the smart cash community, right? you said you wanted change, why don't you start that change off by showing other developers the code behind the fork tipbot etc when they first ask you to, well you thought you were doing the right thing like what they are doing now right? or you thought that's the only reason you are still a member of the hive and once you give that Info's out you would be fired?
Any reason that lead to this shouldn't have made you ask them for a ransom to release the fork code of what they paid you for unless you have a different intention and only coming out clean because they refused your offers.
Its a shame, you maybe right but with the way everything went you definitely didn't do the right, now this is it.
Every project founders in the crypto world gets more of this often and we ain't surprised anymore, all crypto project starts as a centralized body before decentralizing.
This takes time and all this stories you are making up isn't going to make things better but might make people FUD Ont the project you were paid to help grow and that isn't good, tell us weren't you paid monthly like those founders?
Did you disclose how much they are paying you to us and other bonus.
The best way to stop evil isn't with good,
Iseems your evil isn't evil enough.
Lets assume you are trying to help investors like you stated earlier because they are bleeding and you demanded for that 5,000,000smart to distribute back to them, equivalent to 120kusd for destroying your reputations like you claimed, i bet you won't have written this post and would have kept your kite hole shut, rather took the money and ditch people you saying you are protecting, i don't believe that, its all lies, money and men,
That's how we behave, but due to the fact they refused your demands of the ransom, You are screaming to the world to see you are innocent and did that on good purpose, bruv if you are the founder you would have done worst, they have a lot to loss if smart crashes.
Calculating their money and stake is so so wrong buddy. Smart isn't just a crypto project but in some ways a company. See beneath a crypto dev, smart is a company that got stake holders to it,
Satoshi worths a lot, go check his known wallet, so does every dev who worked with him. Why haven't he airdropped to btc holders or isn't btc decentralized.
If the founders haven't put all they got from the start, y'all think it would have gotten to this point that its on now. So they took a risk into a project, reaping it shouldn't bother us well i don't see the reap, they paid them selves for the work, when nobody believed in this coin they stood their grounds, planning, and finding ways to elevate the project, you said they used you, well you are only right if they haven't paid you once but if they have forget it, we the community should be the one saying you all including the founders used us still using us and making us believe in what don't exist, a community driven cryptocurrency that we hold the fate of the coin, now that brings us to the fate of the coin, the proposal section.
- THE PROPOSAL SECTION ISN'T WORKING, YOU DAMN RIGHT ABOUT THAT.
the smart whales are the controllers of proposals, they decide which proposal YES/and the ones that NO'S.
When on telegram, you started the fact about benn swann activities pulling the price down cause of the insane amount , i supported you 💯 percent cause i knew that proposal was doomed and "the price is making smart look stupid in the market"
The proposal section has to be addressed fast cause all this is making it look like smart isn't keeping to their promises, i agree on that.
Recent proposals shows only two with yes, including my proposal of creating a song for smart that everyone told me to go ahead, wonder what is giving it a bad signal after much pressure by everyone to go ahead and create a song.
Meaning their are heavy players not regularly on discord that decide what is done. That's where i have issues.
I did trust you so much man but you broke my heart man, with all this.
What was you idea behind asking for ransom like some terrorists
Tell us the truth and stop covering with the founders holding 70percent of want they created,their ideas. Isn't supposed to be but since its also allowed i see no problems there.
And to smartcash founders, i know you guys are trying to fight spam and scam in the proposal section, but its time the treasurer be put to work for the smarter good,
The amounts sitting there is so alarming, make us feel save, that the 50 percent is for everyone - the airdropping of the treasuries like lets say 30 percent to the community should be encouraged,the funds needs to spread and this would increase smart visibility too as a monthly reward coin (smart rewards)
And a monthly smart airdrop too.
Since the proposal section is controlled by bigger players, smart cash voting system isn't working, i tagged it a hierarchy .
"And to smartcash founders, i know you guys are trying to fight spam and scam in the proposal section, but its time the treasurer be put to work for the smarter good,"
Agreed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree 👍
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
First of all, I did not ask for a ransom. I would not call it a ransom. It was a severance pay for allowing the hives to take ownership of the tipbots in expense of 5M coins. Ransom would be when you kidnap someone and you say you won't release them unless a ransom is paid. I did not kidnap anyone. I already have had full ownership of social media accounts such as smartbot on steemit and smarttipbot on Twitter. But I couldn't post or say what I wanted to say. Everytime I said something the founders didn't like, I was told to be careful what I say or delete that, etc... such as what I said about Ben Swann on Telegram. So I decided to finally leave. The ownership of the tipbots were themselves a leverage just like 5M voting power. I was not going to trade my power and leverage for nothing. I never said I'm going to steal the community funds if the founders don't pay me 5M, did I? They wanted me to give up my power and leverage in exchange of nothing. Now what if they gave me the 5M and took my leverage with tipbots? Then I would have 5M more voting power even if I didn't give any of it to someone else as I say in my post I planned to. It would still be less power in the hands of the founders vs. more power in the hands of someone like me who happens to disagree with some of their views and decisions. ALSO, I did not have to write this to defend myself. After rejecting my offer, they actually begged me a few times to not write anything "negative" and they would also not write anything negative about me so your argument that I am now just trying to defend myself is baseless. Even after posting this which I posted after they went public about me, I once again received a message from JuicyG telling me to delete my post and he would delete his post about me as long as I give them full ownership of the tipbots. But I refused because now that I can't have the 5M voting power, I want to exercise the leverage I have through tipbots. And what was their response? Ban the tipbot from their servers and not return the funds they took. They want full ownership of the tipbots and their social media accounts to maintain their influence. It's not about anyone stealing the community funds. That's all just a bunch of lies they are spreading to make themselves look good and make me look like the bad guy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit