- Steemit is still far from Google in terms of data stored, but even the strongest links in the witnesses chain are far from Google's data center.
- Google has only 1 data center, which may probably be backed up once or even twice, but Steemit has to have many more backups.
- Google can delete when necessary, Steemit still does not.
RE: Nexus & "Social Coin" ICO - A Steem / Facebook Competitor About To Launch (And Faceplant) - Week 1 ICO Ongoing, ICO Buyback Structure
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Nexus & "Social Coin" ICO - A Steem / Facebook Competitor About To Launch (And Faceplant) - Week 1 ICO Ongoing, ICO Buyback Structure
A future hard fork could discard all flagged/hidden content in the future, yes?
I'm not saying this would even be a good thing, necessarily, but the potential is there to shed parts of the database based on witness consensus?
Good points, thanks for the information.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Automatic deletion of flagged content is a bad idea, due to reasons @seraph exists for, and for more reasons Steemit exists for.
Still, there should be additional judgement (human, or even AI) taken prior to a deletion.
But deletion must be done, because the current Steemit model is self-defeating.
Look at sherlockholmes' work.
How this place demands deletions
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, that's what I meant. Not an automatic deletion so much as community-agreed guidelines for filtering some stuff for deletion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I really like the concept though the content can only be hidden, deleting blocks will actually de-value steem if im right.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit