Hey Duat, former LPer/current lurker- I'm not sure I understand the part about "If you win your rating goes up, if you lose your rating goes down. If you have a higher rating than your opponent then you gain more for a win and lose less for a loss, and if you have a lower rating than your opponent you gain less for a win and lose more for a loss." Care to elaborate a bit? Why does a winner playing a loser get more for win, and less for a loss, vs a loser beating a winner gaining less, and losing to a winner lose more?
RE: The Contrarian Case That Andy Murray > Pete Sampras
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The Contrarian Case That Andy Murray > Pete Sampras
Should say the reverse, but too late to update it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit