Blocktrades could remove their vote from proposal 0. Which would drop proposal 0 to 13GV and vote for any other proposal and raise it to 9.7Gv. For instance proposal 10 has 18 GV. So simply by removing a vote from proposal 0 @inertia will recieve funding for documentation.
RE: DONATING 30SB TO STEEM PROPOSALS - Via a Theory Testing Proposal
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
DONATING 30SB TO STEEM PROPOSALS - Via a Theory Testing Proposal
That's true, but in lowering it, other whales can get proposals through also. Other whales can also raise the return proposal.
If Blocktrades is the only whale voting he can control everything. It doesn't take a huge amount of participation from other whales to change that though.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Of course. It'll be the same gripes as witness voting... but I don't see better options. Just different options like voting for representative accounts to vote on funding allocation. The only given is the impossibility to make all parties happy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit