As a character, Stalin was, yes, ruthless, human rights, a rule of law, a democracy, such things were not in his book. Leaving her fellow citizens, married and very young at a very young age, she abandoned her other citizens to suicide.
On the other hand, he had a very strong will, a very strong personality. He was secretive. He was very brave and very daring. He was without doubt very intelligent, very intelligent. He was making long term plans and applying them with determination and cold blood. He didn't have much friendliness, maybe not at all. Even the closest, most loyal friend Beria had been cursing him the moment he died.
What was the motive that led Stalin to do all this? No doubt, he did what he did for the country, for his people. But wasn't there any part of the motivation of being the leader who was inherent in his character, in the first place, being the strongest, his ego?
Did he not receive the reward of his achievements and achievements as the only top man in the world's second most powerful state and benefited from the blessings of this authority?
Now let's answer the question at the beginning of the article. Yes, Stalin was one of the greatest leaders ever trained by the world and a bloody murderer. What I have seen in the film is my personal convictions except what I have conveyed. It may be true, you may be wrong, you may participate or not, they are subjective opinions that can vary according to the person.
Sponsored ( Powered by dclick )
Introducing DCLICK: An Incentivized Ad platform by Proof of Click. - Steem based AdSense.
Hello, Steemians. Let us introduce you a new Steem B...
For the country, he did what he did for his people. But his motivation for being an innate leader in his character became, first and foremost, the most powerful, part of his ego.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit