Curation Efficiency Statistics
Every 24 hours, this report is automatically generated to display the best 25 curators in the last 7 days (minimum 35 full votes - 3500% upvote strength - casted in that time frame)
- The first leaderboard will be the best 25 curators in the last 7 days with a total value of votes casted between 0 and 1$
- The second leaderboard will be the best 25 curators in the last 7 days with a total value of votes casted between 1 and 10$
- The third leaderboard will be the best 25 curators in the last 7 days with a total value of votes casted above 10$
It's the time of the vote that is taken into consideration, whether the posts the votes are casted on are payed out or not
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [O$;1$[
# | Username | Total Votes Value $ | Curation Rewards Value $ | Curation Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | attention-seeker | 0.465 | 0.463 | 99.66 % |
2 | best-strategy | 0.220 | 0.218 | 99.21 % |
3 | tech-coin | 0.706 | 0.681 | 96.49 % |
4 | coinmarketcal2 | 0.595 | 0.572 | 96.08 % |
5 | daijiworld | 0.539 | 0.518 | 96.07 % |
6 | sm-silva | 0.325 | 0.295 | 90.78 % |
7 | steemfond | 0.493 | 0.438 | 88.89 % |
8 | sirbush | 0.172 | 0.149 | 86.68 % |
9 | samboy | 0.596 | 0.513 | 86.05 % |
10 | morwen | 0.939 | 0.803 | 85.51 % |
11 | foodhelp | 0.583 | 0.494 | 84.75 % |
12 | janaveda | 0.566 | 0.479 | 84.68 % |
13 | steemconsole | 0.932 | 0.767 | 82.27 % |
14 | vestlife | 0.192 | 0.156 | 81.19 % |
15 | vgalue | 0.178 | 0.145 | 81.16 % |
16 | discovery-it | 0.528 | 0.427 | 80.94 % |
17 | pondcrosser | 0.667 | 0.534 | 80.06 % |
18 | arv1 | 0.925 | 0.740 | 80.00 % |
19 | zintarmortalis | 0.860 | 0.682 | 79.31 % |
20 | el-panal | 0.258 | 0.204 | 79.00 % |
21 | gabriellecd | 0.256 | 0.201 | 78.61 % |
22 | richjr | 0.485 | 0.379 | 78.01 % |
23 | the.curator | 0.708 | 0.550 | 77.74 % |
24 | thebumplunderer | 0.758 | 0.588 | 77.55 % |
25 | thesoundof | 0.184 | 0.142 | 77.33 % |
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [1$:10$[
# | Username | Total Votes Value $ | Curation Rewards Value $ | Curation Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | curx | 4.327 | 4.477 | 103.47 % |
2 | whatsthatcryptom | 2.740 | 2.645 | 96.53 % |
3 | apix | 9.211 | 8.839 | 95.96 % |
4 | shea851 | 1.470 | 1.386 | 94.31 % |
5 | benedict08 | 7.345 | 6.919 | 94.21 % |
6 | mosquito76 | 5.659 | 5.148 | 90.98 % |
7 | hdu | 8.397 | 7.430 | 88.48 % |
8 | ancient-light | 2.003 | 1.766 | 88.16 % |
9 | coinmarketcal | 6.249 | 5.468 | 87.51 % |
10 | sameer777 | 1.624 | 1.420 | 87.45 % |
11 | steem-d-anlovnit | 1.365 | 1.189 | 87.12 % |
12 | xiguang | 7.917 | 6.823 | 86.18 % |
13 | votes4minnows | 2.576 | 2.186 | 84.86 % |
14 | inciter | 3.414 | 2.895 | 84.79 % |
15 | steemitasclub | 4.558 | 3.846 | 84.39 % |
16 | delabo | 6.349 | 5.346 | 84.21 % |
17 | eliel | 3.130 | 2.627 | 83.92 % |
18 | reazuliqbal | 4.732 | 3.954 | 83.57 % |
19 | ezravandi | 2.835 | 2.364 | 83.37 % |
20 | teofilex11 | 3.842 | 3.195 | 83.17 % |
21 | ebargains | 1.014 | 0.840 | 82.77 % |
22 | la-colmena | 1.884 | 1.558 | 82.70 % |
23 | dirapa | 6.664 | 5.497 | 82.50 % |
24 | angelesdesteemit | 5.165 | 4.250 | 82.29 % |
25 | pataty69 | 3.598 | 2.951 | 82.04 % |
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [10$:∞$[
# | Username | Total Votes Value $ | Curation Rewards Value $ | Curation Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | art.int | 175.580 | 177.240 | 100.95 % |
2 | gerber | 42.744 | 39.923 | 93.40 % |
3 | miti | 18.289 | 17.018 | 93.05 % |
4 | delishtreats | 14.492 | 12.822 | 88.47 % |
5 | steem.services | 29.055 | 24.997 | 86.03 % |
6 | runicar | 26.272 | 22.400 | 85.26 % |
7 | luxbet | 15.980 | 13.095 | 81.95 % |
8 | mehta | 13.697 | 11.223 | 81.94 % |
9 | webdeals | 33.200 | 27.121 | 81.69 % |
10 | mustard-seed | 10.623 | 8.631 | 81.25 % |
11 | karja | 36.836 | 29.306 | 79.56 % |
12 | tangofever | 13.819 | 10.907 | 78.93 % |
13 | spt-skillup | 30.129 | 23.730 | 78.76 % |
14 | reveur | 16.220 | 12.692 | 78.25 % |
15 | nicestbot | 18.824 | 14.669 | 77.93 % |
16 | discernente | 14.753 | 11.317 | 76.71 % |
17 | penguinpablo | 132.646 | 100.810 | 76.00 % |
18 | bluemist | 68.087 | 51.733 | 75.98 % |
19 | accelerator | 54.114 | 40.883 | 75.55 % |
20 | enjoyinglife | 10.670 | 8.060 | 75.54 % |
21 | robmolecule | 17.975 | 13.557 | 75.42 % |
22 | dado13btc | 10.156 | 7.644 | 75.26 % |
23 | funnyman | 23.905 | 17.535 | 73.35 % |
24 | aicu | 37.011 | 27.107 | 73.24 % |
25 | mindtrap | 42.982 | 30.717 | 71.46 % |
If you have any suggestions, want more / less / other data, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to incorporate them !
upon which criteria do you decide what weight to vote with?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The higher the potential payouts, the higher the curation rewards to be distributed, the higher the vote can be.
My bot aims at keeping a steady ROI, so if he can choose between voting at 100% for a potential efficiency of 115% or voting at 1% for a potential efficiency of 125% (the smaller your vote, the higher the efficiency, that's the formula). So if he currently aims at 120% efficiency, he will vote at 50%.
I'm simplifying but that's the spirit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This brightens up my knowledge, thanks. It's nice to see vote efficiency rise by just following your curation trail. Makes me think about powering up or lease some SP. A little profit always comes in handy ;). Seems that the votes go across the platform, so that's another plus.
Thanks for sharing!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit