RE: Voted For Successful Posts BEFORE WHALES BUT ZERO CURATION REWARD - Help - #steemit.com and #steem-help

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Voted For Successful Posts BEFORE WHALES BUT ZERO CURATION REWARD - Help - #steemit.com and #steem-help

in steem-help •  8 years ago 

reward = total_reward * your_weight / total_weight

If your reward is below threshold it gets ignored!

steem-help
8 years ago by

Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

  • Disagreement on rewards
  • Fraud or plagiarism
  • Hate speech or trolling
  • Miscategorized content or spam

Submit
$0.10
  • Past Payouts $0.10
  • - Author $0.09
  • - Curators $0.01
8 votes
2
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  8 years ago 

    Thank you for the formula but I don't think I didn't qualify for 0.001 SP. It looks like this is a bug. I reported it in github too.

    Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

    • Disagreement on rewards
    • Fraud or plagiarism
    • Hate speech or trolling
    • Miscategorized content or spam

    Submit
    $0.00
      2 votes
      [-]
        ·  8 years ago 

      Already a lot of explanations here. It's not a bug. Please make your own calculation to check whether you qualify for 0.001 SP.
      By the way please don't spam Github ticketing system.

      Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

      • Disagreement on rewards
      • Fraud or plagiarism
      • Hate speech or trolling
      • Miscategorized content or spam

      Submit
      $0.00
        1 vote