Splitting blockchain (by block ranges) wouldn't have much much sense because it would be very hard to ask for useful information. However, we are moving towards fabrics and microservices.
RE: Introducing: Steem Pressure #1
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Introducing: Steem Pressure #1
Unless the client who asks for the data is aware of the distribution scheme.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Doesn't matter. If only blocks are distributed then it's really ineffective to grab such data as "who follows user x". Knowing who can give you block ranges is irrelevant info.
Reindexing whole blockchain with tags plugin turned on will get that information for fast access at the run time.
It's in network best interest to have seeders, not leechers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
True. A more clever breakup may be by transaction type.
Ultimately it would even make sense to store monetary transactions in the main chain, text data in one side chain and big data (such as videos) in another.
(I lack culture on this, this is pure speculation)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Having smaller dataset may help having specialized seeders, meaning more seeders. Think of a seeder/cache node specialized in content written in one language.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit