the problem is that we keep trying to use capitalism to fix the faults of capitalism. There is no "good" network we could make that functions on these ideals
RE: Some thoughts on voting and bots
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Some thoughts on voting and bots
Check out abundance societies, they are not capitalism.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I was talking about steem, but alright it sounds interesting
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
alright are you talking about post scarcity? I was hoping it would be something different but that's all that came up.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steem is not capitalism. In capitalism, rewards would be given directly from the consumer to the authors. That is not the case here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
capitalism is private ownership of capital. I'm not talking about your special brand of "ultra-super free market consumer orientated trickle-down capitalism"
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, but the rewards pool does not function as privately owned capital.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
steem power
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I understand your point, but it is still not the same. He doesn't have to give away his wealth in order to spend reward pool money. The reward pool is owned by the Steem community and distributed according to a set of unnatural rules.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"The reward pool is owned by the Steem community and distributed according to a set of unnatural rules."
capitalism itself is an unnatural rule. Private property can only exist through force
"He doesn't have to give away his wealth in order to spend reward pool money."
that has nothing to do with capitalism. Its just investment capital, the most destructive form.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Private property can only exist through force"
Isn't the same true for public property? Is force not a natural phenomena?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
it is the same for public property. Common property on the other hand needs no force between the users
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
" Is force not a natural phenomena"
the use of force is also arbitrary. Using it to uphold social constructs that would not normally arise is not natural. (Unless you want to argue everything that exists is natural)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
" He doesn't have to give away his wealth in order to spend reward pool money"
actually they lose the opportunity to use it on themselves, so even if its not relevant its still wrong
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit