It might be worth discussing the possibility of extending the soft fork to remove voting rights of large exchange accounts. We shouldn't be taking away their ability to transact or do business, but I don't think it would be difficult to get consensus agreement that exchanges should not be having a say in STEEM governance.
Some lessons get learnt the hard way, but the important thing is that we learn them.
Sure, but the exchange can transfer the money to another account and have it voting for witnesses in a matter of seconds. The solution is not an easy one.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
At the moment they can't, because they are powered up :)
This would buy us some time and secure the chain in the short term, but I take your point . There needs to be some kind of agreement put in place with the exchanges longer term that may involve code and/or may involve jurisdictional law.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
if we had the power to push that fork wed just freeze suns accounts and be done with it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit